2020
DOI: 10.5802/jep.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homological support of big objects in tensor-triangulated categories

Abstract: Cet article est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence LICENCE INTERNATIONALE D'ATTRIBUTION CREATIVE COMMONS BY 4.0.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the companion paper [BHS21], we compare the Balmer-Favi notion of support with the homological support introduced by Balmer [Bal20]. In particular, we will prove that they coincide in a strong sense whenever T is stratified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the companion paper [BHS21], we compare the Balmer-Favi notion of support with the homological support introduced by Balmer [Bal20]. In particular, we will prove that they coincide in a strong sense whenever T is stratified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark. For our purposes, the next most significant example is the homological support function introduced by Balmer [Bal20b]. We briefly recall the construction; more details can be found in [Bal20b] and [BKS19].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Balmer-Favi notion of support Supp T does not provide an extension of the universal support on T c to the whole of T without some such hypothesis. Recently, Balmer [Bal20b] has extended homological support to big objects. The resulting notion of support (Spc h (T c ), Supp h T ) does not require any noetherian hypotheses and extends the pull-back supp h T c = φ −1 (supp T c ) of the universal support to the whole of T.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent work [BKS19,Bal20b,Bal20a] introduced and explored homological residue fields as an alternative that exists in broad generality and is always tensorfriendly. They consist of symmetric monoidal homological functors (1.1) hB : T → ĀB from T to 'simple' abelian categories ĀB .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such functor exists for each so-called homological prime B, as recalled in Section 2. These homological residue fields collectively detect the nilpotence of maps [Bal20b] and they give rise to a support theory for not necessarily compact objects [Bal20a]. Homological residue fields are undeniably useful but they are defined in a rather abstract manner and it is not clear how they relate to the tensor-triangulated residue fields F : T → F that partially exist in examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%