2013
DOI: 10.3917/crii.059.0047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homologie et conductivité internationales. L'État social aux prises avec l'OCDE, l'UE et les gouvernements

Abstract: National audienceAn examination of the job and unemployment programs of the OECD and the European Commission in the two decades since 1990 shows that their circuit of production and homologous legitimation has been marked by the domination of governments and these organizations’ economic sectors over social sectors. Each of these institutional universes is characterized by an asymmetric relationship between the “economic” and the “social”, something that affects the content of their diagnostics and prescriptio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They are widely recognised in their home countries and even internationally – which certainly explains their capacity to weigh in on the debate. While the hierarchical structures at the international level may be the same as at national level – as evidenced for instance by Gayon (2013), who especially underlines the same hierarchical line between economic and social directorates within the OECD, the EU and their Member States –, this shows that this is not always the case. The researchers’ positions can differ at national and international level, and even between different international spaces.…”
Section: The Funding Policy’s Impact On Academics Between Strategies ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are widely recognised in their home countries and even internationally – which certainly explains their capacity to weigh in on the debate. While the hierarchical structures at the international level may be the same as at national level – as evidenced for instance by Gayon (2013), who especially underlines the same hierarchical line between economic and social directorates within the OECD, the EU and their Member States –, this shows that this is not always the case. The researchers’ positions can differ at national and international level, and even between different international spaces.…”
Section: The Funding Policy’s Impact On Academics Between Strategies ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th is approach has been particularly prominent in the French-speaking academic realm. Th e emphasis has been placed on the diff usion of the market paradigm, or référentiel , through practices shaping public policy in various sectors such as agriculture (Jobert 1994 ;Fouilleux 2003 ), research (Bruno 2008 ), monetary policy ( Fontan 2013 ), social policy (Gayon 2013 ) or labour market reforms ( Caune 2014 ). Th e sociological approach consists of explaining policy outcomes through everyday agency within the EU institutions, the use of expertise, framing and reframing by EU and national actors, or the diff usion of ideas across networks, including international organizations like the Organization for European Cooperation and Development (OECD).…”
Section: Is the Eu Bound To Be Neoliberal?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. Gayon (2013) et Grek (2014) ont montré les liens complexes unissant ces deux organisations, malgré leurs différences institutionnelles.…”
Section: Revue Française D'administration Publiqueunclassified