2010
DOI: 10.14411/eje.2010.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homologies of the head of Membracoidea based on nymphal morphology with notes on other groups of Auchenorrhyncha (Hemiptera)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dmitriev (2010) treated Auchenorrhyncha as a monophyletic group in a recent morphological investigation of adult and nymphal head capsule features. The ground plan for auchenorrhynchan head structure was discussed, and numerous hypotheses of structural homology across Fulgoromorpha and Cicadomorpha were detailed; however, because of the apparent assumption of Auchenorrhyncha monophyly, no characters are described specifically as synapomorphies for the suborder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dmitriev (2010) treated Auchenorrhyncha as a monophyletic group in a recent morphological investigation of adult and nymphal head capsule features. The ground plan for auchenorrhynchan head structure was discussed, and numerous hypotheses of structural homology across Fulgoromorpha and Cicadomorpha were detailed; however, because of the apparent assumption of Auchenorrhyncha monophyly, no characters are described specifically as synapomorphies for the suborder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors were circumspect with regard to the phylogenetic importance of internal genitalic characters, and did not comment on the direct impact of their study on the question of Auchenorrhyncha monophyly; nevertheless, these male lateral ejaculatory ducts represent a potentially synapomorphic condition for Auchenorrhyncha. Dmitriev (2010) treated Auchenorrhyncha as a monophyletic group in a recent morphological investigation of adult and nymphal head capsule features. The ground plan for auchenorrhynchan head structure was discussed, and numerous hypotheses of structural homology across Fulgoromorpha and Cicadomorpha were detailed; however, because of the apparent assumption of Auchenorrhyncha monophyly, no characters are described specifically as synapomorphies for the suborder.…”
Section: Review: Morphological Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A distinct tylus is one of the characteristic features of Recent Cercopoidea and Cicadoidea; however, it is also recognizable among some Membracoidea, as well as among extinct Hylicellidae. Dmitriev (2010) discussed the head structures and showed that in the Recent Cercopoidea after moulting, a portion of the postclypeus restricted anteriorly by the anterior carina and posteriorly by the epistomal suture becomes embedded into the crown as a distinct plate, that is, the tylus. A triangular frons, clearly separated and with a median ocellus, is a feature shared with presumed basal Clypeata–Hylicellidae and their descendants, early Procercopidae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the modern Clypeata, three ocelli are retained only in Tettigarctidae and Cicadidae (Cicadoidea). In the Recent Cercopoidea, a median ocellus as well as a separated frons is not visible (Dmitriev 2010). Three close‐set ocelli are still present in Cicadoidea, but also in extinct Karajassidae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation