Homophobic Nationalism: The Development of Sodomy Legislation in Uganda

Abstract

Literature on sexuality and citizenship has demonstrated the myriad of ways that states use legislation to produce, regulate, and protect a sexually and racially “pure” citizen. In the context of the European imperial powers, this citizen is heterosexual, monogamous, and white. In the postcolonial Ugandan context, the development of sodomy legislation shows that this ideal citizen is heterosexual, monogamous, and yet untarnished by contemporary Western ideals (which is undoubtedly paradoxical). This work engages with colonial legislative texts, most notably the Ugandan Penal Code Act of 1950. The author then triangulates this with an analysis of the Anti-Homosexuality Bill and Act and parliamentary record from 1999-2013. With this data, it is argued that the Ugandan construct of an ideal citizen is not only a reactionary result of colonialism, but that it is also demonstrative of the anti-globalization ideology that has heightened in the wake of rapidngoization of the globallgbtirights movement.

Decolonial Homophobia: Is Decolonisation Incompatible with LGBT+ Affirmation in Christian Ethics?

“…Rodriguez, The Economies of Queer Inclusion, pp. [49][50][51][52][53]64,[72][73][80][81][82][83][84][89][90][91]'Global Homocapitalism',p. 39 the decolonial homophobia argument tacitly supports dangerous and oppressive homophobic nationalism, which repeats imperial patterns, even in apparent service of decolonisation.…”

“…Rodriguez suggest recent decolonial homophobia in Uganda and elsewhere involves local post-colonial elites adopting a colonial 'project to define and control African sexuality'. 84 Heterosexual male elites in post-colonial nations, they argue, react against imperialism by absorbing some of the empire's ideas, such as its Victorian ideals of the family, its fear of African sexual embodiment, and its model of the ideal (male, heterosexual, economically productive) citizen. 85 Adopting and adapting dominant norms as a strategy of colonised groups is fruitfully read through Homi Bhabha's concepts of 'mimicry' and 'imperial hybridity'.…”

Understanding Queer Oppression and Resistance in the Global Economy: Towards a Theoretical Framework for Political Economy

“…It also challenges reductive, Orientalist accounts that characterise 'African homophobia' as a somehow timeless or trans-historical phenomenon. Studies from other parts of Africa and the Caribbean show how homophobia and hetero-patriarchal sex/gender regimes are not only bound up in the histories and experiences of colonisation, but have become increasingly encoded within the cultural and political-economic practices of postcolonial state-building (Alexander 2005, Ndjio 2012, Rodriguez 2017, Currier 2018. In Ghana, the politicisation of homosexuality since the early 2000s has similarly worked to enmesh homophobia within debates on national identity and citizenship, political and economic sovereignty, and anti-imperialism.…”

A Science Mapping Analysis of Sixty-Seven Years of Scientific Evolution about the Transgender Population

“…These studies also address immigrants and how they are seen in their country of origin and in others. Relating to such construction, the studies address 'NATIONALISM', which concerns the particular way each nationality sees homosexuality and different gender identities, creating norms specific to their culture [34]. It is noticed that these themes are crossed by the fact that the pattern discussed by transnationalism directly influences the different nations, and even so, each one of them has its particularities and norms.…”