The commentary introduces autoepistemology as a first-person reflection on one’s own epistemic framework, using the example of assessing and commenting on other authors’ works. The problem of evaluation is exacerbated when dealing with analyses from radically different intellectual and cultural contexts. It is suggested that reviews and commentaries are operating within social and academic traditions and horizons that influence first-person knowledge and expertise. Discussing the two special issue articles, it is argued that power differentials cannot be overcome by focusing on equity, diversity, and inclusion but by making changes to the sociohistorical realities that constitute an assumed supremacy. Epistemic modesty, reflexivity, and a beginner’s mind are recommended when a scholar from the North discusses articles from the South.