1993
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.1370100502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homozygous parent affected sib pair method for detecting disease predisposing variants: Application to insulin dependent diabetes mellitus

Abstract: For complex genetic diseases involving incomplete penetrance, genetic heterogeneity, and multiple disease genes, it is often difficult to determine the molecular variant(s) responsible for the disease pathogenesis. Linkage and association studies may help identify genetic regions and molecular variants suspected of being directly responsible for disease predisposition or protection, but, especially for complex diseases, they are less useful for determining when a predisposing molecular variant has been identif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(21 reference statements)
2
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the estimated "control" frequencies are low, the CIs are broad, and a statistically significant hierarchy of risk for all diplotypes cannot be established from these data, but clearly, the DR3/4, the DR4/4, and DR4/8 diplotypes (excluding DRB1*0404) have the highest risk. The estimated risk for the DR3/3 diplotype is somewhat lower than in other studies (31); this difference may reflect the well-known risk heterogeneity of the DR3 haplotype (32,33), which implicates loci other than DRB1, DQA1, and DQB1 in determining the extent of risk on DR3 haplotypes. Type 1 diabetes risk in closely related DR-DQ haplotypes.…”
Section: ϫ05contrasting
confidence: 45%
“…Because the estimated "control" frequencies are low, the CIs are broad, and a statistically significant hierarchy of risk for all diplotypes cannot be established from these data, but clearly, the DR3/4, the DR4/4, and DR4/8 diplotypes (excluding DRB1*0404) have the highest risk. The estimated risk for the DR3/3 diplotype is somewhat lower than in other studies (31); this difference may reflect the well-known risk heterogeneity of the DR3 haplotype (32,33), which implicates loci other than DRB1, DQA1, and DQB1 in determining the extent of risk on DR3 haplotypes. Type 1 diabetes risk in closely related DR-DQ haplotypes.…”
Section: ϫ05contrasting
confidence: 45%
“…This demonstrates risk heterogeneity of DR3 haplotypes and is consistent with the hypothesis that this polymorphism, or another locus in LD with it, may affect T1D susceptibility independently of HLA class II loci. However, risk heterogeneity of DR3 haplotypes has been previously demonstrated, with those DR3 haplotypes that carry B18 alleles having higher T1D risk than those DR3 haplotypes that carry B8 alleles [20]. We found that the putative predisposing allele "A" of the TNF G(-238)A SNP is found on B18-DR3 haplotypes in this data set but is absent from B8-DR3 haplotypes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Previous reports have indicated that this DR3 haplotype has a somewhat lower risk for type 1 diabetes than other DR3 haplotypes [19], although one study concluded that the type 1 diabetes risk for the 8.1 haplotype was not different than that of other DR3 haplotypes [20]. These data suggest that the 8.1 haplotype may contain protective alleles at loci near or identical to HLA-A*0101 as well as near or identical to DPB1*0101.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%