1966
DOI: 10.1093/genetics/53.1.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HOMOZYGOUS VIABILITY AND FERTILITY LOADS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The qualitative difference observed between male and female fertility loads indicates that this species carries recessive alleles which, when homozygous, cause male sterility, but no equivalent recessives affecting female fertility. That male sterility recessives do not cause sterility in females is not surprising considering the differences in egg and sperm development, matching the sex-specificity of sterility (but not inviability) factors in Drosophila (Chung 1962;Temin 1966;Lindsley & Tokuyasu 1980, p. 273). The real puzzle of these results is twofold: why is the magnitude of the male fertility load so great, and why, by contrast, is the female fertility load negligible?…”
Section: Results and Discussion (A) Separating Viability From Fertility Effectsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The qualitative difference observed between male and female fertility loads indicates that this species carries recessive alleles which, when homozygous, cause male sterility, but no equivalent recessives affecting female fertility. That male sterility recessives do not cause sterility in females is not surprising considering the differences in egg and sperm development, matching the sex-specificity of sterility (but not inviability) factors in Drosophila (Chung 1962;Temin 1966;Lindsley & Tokuyasu 1980, p. 273). The real puzzle of these results is twofold: why is the magnitude of the male fertility load so great, and why, by contrast, is the female fertility load negligible?…”
Section: Results and Discussion (A) Separating Viability From Fertility Effectsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These results are consistent with our previous interpretation of the pattern of heterosis in this species (Saccheri et al 1996), but also allow the separate quantification of zygote viability load and fertility load. The zygote and embryo viability load (V ) estimated from P and F 1 egg hatching distributions was 1:75^1:29 (95% confidence interval) lethal equivalents per zygote, which is about twice the viability load in Drosophila (when calculated in an equivalent way and assuming that two-thirds of the load affecting egg to adult survival in Drosophila affects viability Male-biased inbreeding depression I. J. Saccheri and others 41 rather than fertility (see Pavan et al 1951;Temin 1966;Saccheri et al 1996)). The fertility load (S ) estimated from P and XP egg hatching distributions, where in XP parents are inbred but their offspring are outcrossed, was 5.47^0.24.…”
Section: Results and Discussion (A) Separating Viability From Fertility Effectsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the homozygotes of quasinormal viability, the following percentages of chromosomes induced complete sterility of the females: 10.6% for second, 13.6% for third, and 4.3% for the fourth chromosomes. SWEET and SPIES (1962) found in D. melanogaster 7.9% of the homozygotes for the second and 7.8% for the third chromosomes completely sterile as females; a comparable figure obtained for second chromosomes by TEMIN (1966) is 4.2%. In the present study, only 5.1% (6 out of 118) of second chromosomes of D. pseudoabscura, giving quasinormal or mild semilethal viabilities, proved almost completely sterile, yielding fewer than one individual in the progeny after a six-day period of egg laying.…”
Section: Viability (Percent Wild Type) Fecundity (Eggs In Six Days) Suruiual (Percent Suruiuors From Eggs To Adults) and Fertility (The Pmentioning
confidence: 84%