2002
DOI: 10.1080/0005772x.2002.11099532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Honey bee winter mortality in France in 1999 and 2000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
32
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…High rates of mortality are tied to the presence of autoinfective spores that facilitate the rapid division and invasion of digestive tissue and affect the regenerative digestive cells (15). These differences can be related to the recently described higher colony losses during the last few years, especially at the end of winter (9,24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High rates of mortality are tied to the presence of autoinfective spores that facilitate the rapid division and invasion of digestive tissue and affect the regenerative digestive cells (15). These differences can be related to the recently described higher colony losses during the last few years, especially at the end of winter (9,24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2000 harvest was just 30-40% of the 1995-1996 yields and disease remains a major factor. One French national survey noted that 76% of apiaries suffered from at least one serious disease (Faucon et al, 2002). In other countries and in oilseed rape crops, which serve as key pollen and nectar sources for bees at particular times of the year, imidacloprid seed treatments have not been associated with bee declines.…”
Section: Insecticides Dogma and Pragmatismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several behavioral studies, dealing with sublethal effects of pesticides, have indicated that there might be an important impact of such products on winter mortality (Faucon et al, 2002;Thompson et al, 2007), orientation (Decourtye et al, 2004), homing behavior , locomotor activity (Suchail et al, 2001;El Hassani et al, 2008) and communicative capacity (Haynes, 1988;Medrzycki et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%