1991
DOI: 10.2307/258870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Honeymoons and the Liability of Adolescence: A New Perspective on Duration Dependence in Social and Organizational Relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
184
0
5

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
184
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to observation period, the 'liability of newness' (Stinchcombe, 1965) and the 'liability of adolescence' hypotheses (e.g., Brüderl and Schüssler, 1990;Fichmann and Levinthal, 1991;Mahmood, 2000) have to be taken into account. While the former postulates that young businesses have a higher risk of failure compared to older businesses, the latter suggests an inverted U-shaped pattern of business failure over time.…”
Section: Observation Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to observation period, the 'liability of newness' (Stinchcombe, 1965) and the 'liability of adolescence' hypotheses (e.g., Brüderl and Schüssler, 1990;Fichmann and Levinthal, 1991;Mahmood, 2000) have to be taken into account. While the former postulates that young businesses have a higher risk of failure compared to older businesses, the latter suggests an inverted U-shaped pattern of business failure over time.…”
Section: Observation Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relationship is explained by the "liability of adolescence" effect (Fichman and Levinthal, 1991) and the "liability of senescence" effect (Hannah, 1998). According to the liability of adolescence effect, entrant firms are "protected" from failure by initial resource endowments and strategic choices made by firms to compete in the market.…”
Section: The Determinants Of Firm Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Audit opinion was measured as a dummy variable with a value of 1 if a qualified opinion was issued in the year prior to an event.5 A variable for incumbent auditors' membership in the Big Eight, the eight largest U.S. auditing firms,6 was included to control for a trend toward use of Big Eight auditors (Eichenseher & Danos, 1981;McConnell, 1984). Prior research has shown systematic differences in the duration of auditorclient relationships (Fichman & Levinthal, 1991a,b) depending on type of audit firm, with client relations with Big Eight firms being longer-lived. We included this distinction to control for the higher probability of switching if a current auditor was not a Big Eight firm.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%