Hong Kong and the globalisation of the Chinese diaspora: a geographical perspective

Abstract

This study examines the processes of spatial restructuring in the Hong Kong–South China region. The paper analyses urban‐rural interaction in a historical and transnational context. Based on detailed census data collected in 1961 and 1996, this study traces the origins of the Hongkongers and maps out their spatial distribution according to their native place identities. The heightened population movement between the rural hinterland in the South China region and the Hong Kong metropolis is inseparable from territorial organisation on the Chinese mainland. The great spatial mobility demonstrated by the Hongkongers, or, their ‘refugee mentality’ as it is known, is found to be deeply rooted in their marginal sub‐ethnic identity in the nation. A systematic analysis of spatial data reveals that the diasporic landscape developed in Hong Kong has been polarised by the élite English and Shanghainese speakers on the one end and the Kejia people on the other end. Despite the processes of globalisation, the great spatial mobility of the Hong Kong sojourners and the diasporic landscape they have created have been effectively shaped by their place‐based ethno‐linguistic identities. If the transnational movement of people is considered an important component of globalisation, then this study reinforces the importance of locality and contests the fashionable notion of globalisation as a ‘placeless’ phenomenon. The seemingly displaced empire of Chinese diaspora capitalism, in which Hong Kong has played a crucial part, has remained grounded by pre‐existing place‐specific conditions.

Sustainable Tourism Design through Preserving Regional Identity: A Study from Iran

“…Because of its dynamic characteristics, it is not possible to define identity precisely and, therefore, it is not possible to recommend proper identity for specific built-environment. As Lin (2002) states identity has multiple levels and it is changeable depending on various circumstances. Regarding to its dynamic nature, Hall sees identity as a '"production", which is never complete, always in the process, and always constituted within, not outside, representation' (Hall 1997).…”

“…For example, Lin (2002) speaks about "The shift of intellectual emphasis from modernity (homogenizing processes of cultural imperialism and Westernization) to post modernity (fragmented global, cultural transformation processes with great diversity, variety, and flexibility)". In view of that, regionalism has found highly positive implications.…”

Losing of Local Identity in Rapid Developing China

“…Identity is a dynamic process of changing surrounding factors, such as environment and time [3,4]. Deffnerpointed out that identity is also related to the historical heritage and the traditional characteristics of the region [5].…”

An Inquiry into Cultural Continuity and Change in Housing: An Iranian Perspective

“…Such tendencies, however, have not been limited to Iran. In fact, as Lin (2002) states, the shift of the intellectual emphasis from modernity (homogenizing processes of cultural imperialism and Westernization) to post-modernism (fragmented global cultural transformation processes) has been important in developing countries. In addition, the concept of regional identity has always had positive implications, partly because of the implicit assumption that it connects and brings people and places together, and provides people with shared "regional values" and improved "self-confidence" (Passi, 2002).…”