1974
DOI: 10.2307/2094235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Honor, Normative Ambiguity and Gang Violence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Violence is often a defining characteristic in describing gangs (Decker & van Winkle, 1996), and is justified through violent and aggressive attitudes that are strengthened by gang membership (Horowitz & Schwartz, 1974). This suggests that violence is an important part of gang membership.…”
Section: Violent Attitudes and Gang Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Violence is often a defining characteristic in describing gangs (Decker & van Winkle, 1996), and is justified through violent and aggressive attitudes that are strengthened by gang membership (Horowitz & Schwartz, 1974). This suggests that violence is an important part of gang membership.…”
Section: Violent Attitudes and Gang Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For gang members, long-term abstract goals, such as being respected and feared, influence the preparedness of the individual for aggression [e.g., Horowitz and Schwartz, 1974;Klein and Maxson, 1989]. In the research literature on cognitive processes, Denzler et al [2009] showed that the goal to aggress increases accessibility of aggressive thoughts and that goal fulfillment reduces accessibility of aggressive content and the likelihood of aggressive behavior.…”
Section: Role Of Goals In Aggressive Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vagueness may even be favored by certain interactional considerations, such as power differentials between the interactants, or it may be motivated by the need to present oneself as "in" and hence to avoid embarrassing questions about things that everyone might be presumed to know. Horowitz and Schwartz (1974) make the encouraging observation that talk about activities in the field of the youth matches their observations in the field. 8 The problems of assigning meaning to talk of peer associations are further compounded by the existence of subgroups, cliques, and smaller units, all of which lack names, making it difficult to talk about them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%