2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Honor to the core: Measuring implicit honor ideology endorsement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such research could occur at a more "macro" level in comparisons of nations that differ in the extent to which they are characterized by honor values and at a more "micro" level in studies that use more subtle measures of honor ideology endorsement, including nonconscious ones (e.g., Imura et al, 2014) as well as more subtle measures of MHC stigma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such research could occur at a more "macro" level in comparisons of nations that differ in the extent to which they are characterized by honor values and at a more "micro" level in studies that use more subtle measures of honor ideology endorsement, including nonconscious ones (e.g., Imura et al, 2014) as well as more subtle measures of MHC stigma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second constraint imposed by text-based stimuli is that such stimuli can be difficult to transport into paradigms that target rapid affective or intuitive psychological processes that are central to many current theories of moral cognition [ 40 , 42 47 ]. Although researchers can potentially employ such paradigms with the presentation of one or a few words [ 48 51 ], this comes at the expense of the richness and realism that can be achieved with other mediums (consider the vastly different psychological experiences elicited by seeing the word “assault” as opposed to seeing an image or video of assault, let alone witnessing assault in person).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with theory, respondents from the U.S. South score higher on the HIM than northerners do (Barnes, Brown, et al, ), and in recent research, the scale has been shown to predict risk‐taking tendencies (Barnes, Brown, & Tamborski, ), a preference for using patronyms in naming children (Brown, Carvallo, & Imura, ), implicit honor endorsement (Imura, Burkley, & Brown, ) and defensive responses to group‐level provocations (Barnes, Brown, et al, ; Barnes, Brown, Lenes, et al, ). Although this approach to measurement makes inferences about the sociocultural origins of the beliefs difficult, it gains the benefit of identifying masculine honor endorsers wherever they reside and however they came to possess the mentality.…”
Section: Definitions and Measurements Of Honormentioning
confidence: 63%