2015
DOI: 10.2989/1814232x.2015.1026842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hooking mortality of scalloped hammerheadSphyrna lewiniand great hammerheadSphyrna mokarransharks caught on bottom longlines

Abstract: The scalloped hammerhead Sphyrna lewini and the great hammerhead S. mokarran are typically caught as bycatch in a variety of fisheries and are listed as globally Endangered by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature. Due to very high at-vessel mortality for these species, research is needed on fishing methods to reduce mortality for longline-captured sharks. A series of fishing experiments were conducted employing hook timers and temperature-depth recorders on contracted commercial vessels fishi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Over a thirty-day period, GH 3 used waters 6 m or less during 93% of the time at liberty. This finding is similar to the results presented by Hueter and Manire [17], who noted that great hammerheads along the southwest coast of Florida were only seen at depths shallower than ~ 6 m. In the US bottom longline fishery, great hammerheads are most commonly captured in waters less than 20 m [6]. Roemer et al [18] described six instances of extreme shallow water habitat use by great hammerheads, five of which involved prey capture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over a thirty-day period, GH 3 used waters 6 m or less during 93% of the time at liberty. This finding is similar to the results presented by Hueter and Manire [17], who noted that great hammerheads along the southwest coast of Florida were only seen at depths shallower than ~ 6 m. In the US bottom longline fishery, great hammerheads are most commonly captured in waters less than 20 m [6]. Roemer et al [18] described six instances of extreme shallow water habitat use by great hammerheads, five of which involved prey capture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Great hammerheads are listed on the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) red list as Endangered [3] and thought to be functionally extinct throughout parts of their historical range (e.g., Gulf of California, [4]). Despite a lack of a directed fishery in the northwest Atlantic Ocean, great hammerheads are caught incidentally in longline fisheries, where they suffer high at-vessel [5,6] and post-release [7,8] mortality. Given…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the predictable, seasonal, return-use of specific locations, areas or migratory routes enhances vulnerability to spatially focused fishing (Chapman et al, 2015;Queiroz et al, 2016). For great hammerheads, this is particularly concerning given their declining global populations, low and diffuse abundance, sensitivity to capture mortality and demand in the fin trade (Miller et al, 2014;Gulak et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gulak et al (2015) noted that reducing soak times to avoid capture was not economically viable, thus time-area closures were discussed as a possible option to improve management. The above analysis would enable the identification of potential time-area closures that could be most effective on reducing great hammerhead catches, while minimizing lost catches of other species and effort displacement.…”
Section: Conservation and Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in diving behavior of other shark species have previously been attributed to stress reactions in response to the capture and handling process [e.g., 36]. Sphyrnids in particular were shown to be inherently vulnerable to capture stress [e.g., 37,38]. However, our tagging operation (from the shark being hooked to its' release) took less than 6 min; we thus consider it unlikely that the observed increase in mesopelagic excursions 2 months into the tracking period was related to a possible capture trauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%