2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4017(03)00162-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hookworms of feral cats in Florida

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
24
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…High frequency of Ancylostoma sp. (78%), but less than that of the present study, was reported by Anderson et al (2003) among feral cats in Florida. High prevalence of hookworms may be associated with the direct monoxenous life cycle of nematodes, high egg production by females and a capacity among filarial larvae to promote active infection.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…High frequency of Ancylostoma sp. (78%), but less than that of the present study, was reported by Anderson et al (2003) among feral cats in Florida. High prevalence of hookworms may be associated with the direct monoxenous life cycle of nematodes, high egg production by females and a capacity among filarial larvae to promote active infection.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…These values are generally lower than values published previously. [5][6][7][8][9]11 For instance, a recent study 8 of 184 cats examined at animal control agencies in Georgia in which fecal samples were tested by means of the zinc sulfate flotation method reported that prevalence of roundworm infection was 28.2% and that prevalence of hookworm infection was 10.2%. 8 In a study 5 of 2,000 cats examined at the Veterinary Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 1984 and 1991 in which fecal samples were tested by means of the zinc sulfate centrifugal method, the prevalence of roundworm infection was 16% and the prevalence of hookworm infection was < 1%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disease transmission seems, however, to be the most important disturbance effect in many continental countries (Cleaveland et al, 2000;Frolich et al, 2000;Anderson et al, 2003;Hammer et al, 2004). Past studies have explored the presence of domestic dogs in wild areas or their impact on wild species (Herranz et al, 2002;Butler et al, 2004;Manor and Saltz, 2004;Anderson et al, 2006), however few studies have been conducted in Neotropical forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%