2021
DOI: 10.1080/21639159.2020.1785914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hope for a stronger discipline of marketing

Abstract: To a new generation of marketing scholars, Shelby Hunt might be identified with Resource-Advantage (RA) Theory, marketing theory books, or philosophy of science debates from the 1980s. This article intends to put Hunt's publishing efforts into a richer perspective for the reader. The outcome of Hunt's works has strengthened the marketing discipline and allowed it to avoid being taken over by neighboring disciplines in business academia, such as management. The article first offers an overview of Hunt's works a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fourth paper by Peterson and Park (2021) (i) starts with a discussion of the role of Professor Hunt's research into the nature and scope of marketing in establishing marketing as a field of study that stands on its own, (ii) focuses on Hunt's macromarketing and ethics contributions in the process of relevant knowledge creation, and (iii) provides thoughts on future research possibilities on the foundations of Professor Hunt's contributions. Recognizing Professor Hunt as a research ranger who published a total of 180 journal articles with 54 in marketing theory and philosophy of marketing science, 53 in strategy, competition, and marketing management, 31 in relationship marketing and channels, 37 in macromarketing, ethics, and social responsibility, and 5 in consumer behavior, education, and other topics, Peterson and Park (2021) laud Professor Hunt's research as boundary spanning and bridge building efforts. Peterson and Park (2021) conclude by calling on marketing scholars to emulate Hunt in examining emerging ethical issues in marketing like neuromarketing, globalization in Asia, and potential moderators of ethicality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fourth paper by Peterson and Park (2021) (i) starts with a discussion of the role of Professor Hunt's research into the nature and scope of marketing in establishing marketing as a field of study that stands on its own, (ii) focuses on Hunt's macromarketing and ethics contributions in the process of relevant knowledge creation, and (iii) provides thoughts on future research possibilities on the foundations of Professor Hunt's contributions. Recognizing Professor Hunt as a research ranger who published a total of 180 journal articles with 54 in marketing theory and philosophy of marketing science, 53 in strategy, competition, and marketing management, 31 in relationship marketing and channels, 37 in macromarketing, ethics, and social responsibility, and 5 in consumer behavior, education, and other topics, Peterson and Park (2021) laud Professor Hunt's research as boundary spanning and bridge building efforts. Peterson and Park (2021) conclude by calling on marketing scholars to emulate Hunt in examining emerging ethical issues in marketing like neuromarketing, globalization in Asia, and potential moderators of ethicality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognizing Professor Hunt as a research ranger who published a total of 180 journal articles with 54 in marketing theory and philosophy of marketing science, 53 in strategy, competition, and marketing management, 31 in relationship marketing and channels, 37 in macromarketing, ethics, and social responsibility, and 5 in consumer behavior, education, and other topics, Peterson and Park (2021) laud Professor Hunt's research as boundary spanning and bridge building efforts. Peterson and Park (2021) conclude by calling on marketing scholars to emulate Hunt in examining emerging ethical issues in marketing like neuromarketing, globalization in Asia, and potential moderators of ethicality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%