Hope for the best, prepare for the worst: barriers to service innovation

Abstract

Purpose Despite the growing scholarly interest in service innovation and its associated benefits for organizations, research into the barriers to developing new services remains scant. In addition, most of these studies have been mainly conducted at the firm level, failing to incorporate macro forces in the industry. To fill this gap, this study aims to investigate major industry trends as well as organizational attributes that affect organizations’ capability in designing innovative services. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative approach was used. In all, 21 semi-structured interviews with senior executives in different banks were conducted to collect data. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis. Findings The results of this study suggest that privatization, technological shortcomings, legislative inefficiencies and deposit orientation instead of market orientation were major industry trends that affect service innovation. Furthermore, ambiguity in knowledge management regimes, silo mentality and the absence of a collaborative organizational culture, growing need to focus on human capital and risk aversion were the main organizational attributes that should be addressed for effective service innovation. Practical implications Service innovation is a strategic asset for organizations. To effectively leverage the benefits, managers should have an end-to-end approach toward the subject. The findings of this study would inform managers of different obstacles in the development of new services from an organizational and industry-wide perspective. Based on the outputs of the interviews and a thorough review of the literature, managerial implications are presented. Originality/value This study is one of the few studies that explores service innovation challenges at both macro and micro levels of analysis, providing a more holistic view of the phenomenon in the context of service organizations.

Bridging the marketing-finance divide: use of customer voice in managerial decision-making

“…Increasingly, customer voice is also being used to enhance knowledge and understanding among senior decision-makers to frame discussions on tactical service improvements (Brown et al , 2019; Velayati et al , 2020) such as restyling or refurbishments. Because such initiatives require a significant budget, the customer voice plays a knowledge-enhancing role (Menon and Varadarajan, 1992; Morgan et al , 2005; Rollins et al , 2012) with F&A data providing the primary basis.…”

“…Thus, marketers need to prove their value to the firm but can usually do so only within a dominant F&A mindset that severely limits their validity and impact (Hanssens and Pauwels, 2016). Against this backdrop, research on the marketing-finance interface (Hanssens, 2019; Sidhu and Roberts, 2008) is critical because these functions often work in silos (Velayati et al , 2020), reflecting a practice of myopic management (Mizik, 2010).…”

“…As Wedel and Kannan (2016) While the majority of available research focuses on justifying the value of listening to customer voice and the potential of big data analytics for firms, insights into their impact on managerial decision-making processes and practices is rather limited (Holmlund et al, 2020). Senior managers in particular seem to have a less than adequate understanding of social media and big data usage (Lacoste, 2016) and are potentially hampered by a relative lack of technical knowledge (Merendino et al, 2018;Velayati et al, 2020). This is compounded by cognitive overload (Martin and Golsby-Smith, 2017;Saxena and Lamest, 2018) caused because of the high variety, volume and velocity of big data.…”

“…customers are invited to share their opinions), ubiquitous public social media platforms have increased the importance of unsolicited consumer-generated opinions (Diffley and McCole, 2019; Whiting et al , 2019), which have become a central influence on customers’ purchase decisions in many industries, especially tourism and hospitality (Litvin et al , 2018), where electronic word of mouth (eWoM) has proven to be of enormous importance by driving important outcomes such as online bookings (Ye et al , 2011) and increased occupancy rates (Viglia et al , 2016). While much of this research focuses on the impact of eWoM on customer decision-making (for recent reviews see Muritala et al , 2020; Nusair et al , 2019), from a marketing management perspective the important question is how this vast and varied data can and is used internally to improve the customer experience (Strong, 2014; Rageh et al , 2013; Velayati et al , 2020).…”

What drives an innovative behaviour of sustainable community-based enterprises? Insights from a qualitative case study

“…Drawing on innovative behaviour, contribution to foster innovative services, which are related to implementing innovative technology, leads to SCBEs (Thomas, 2019; Miller and Miller, 2020; Velayati et al , 2020). Previous scholars (Picciotti, 2017; Owen et al , 2019) suggested that the enterprise should take the initiative of innovative intention, orientation, collaboration and competition.…”