Hope predicted quality of life in dyads of community-dwelling patients receiving hemodialysis and their family caregivers

Al‐Rawashdeh, Sami; Alshraifeen, Ali; Rababa, Mohammad; Ashour, Ala

doi:10.1007/s11136-019-02378-4

Cited by 19 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Consequently, results may not be generalizable to the overall dialysis/ICD population. However, we found approximately equal levels of QOL in our dialysis population compared with reports in the literature [ 5 , 24 , 33 ]. Also, we did not include patients with a class I indication for ICD implantation according to the current guidelines.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 44%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The impact of transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation on quality of life, depression and optimism in dialysis patients: report on the secondary outcome of QOL in the randomized controlled ICD2 trial

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rationale The impact of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation on the psychological well-being of patients on dialysis is unknown. Objective We aimed to identify the effect of primary ICD implantation on quality of life (QoL), mood and dispositional optimism in patients undergoing dialysis. Methods and results We performed a prespecified subanalysis of the randomized controlled ICD2 trial. In total, 177 patients on chronic dialysis, with an age of 55–81 years, and a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥ 35%, were included in the per-protocol analysis. Eighty patients received an ICD for primary prevention, and 91 patients received standard care. The Short Form-36 (SF-36), Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15), Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R) questionnaires were administered prior to ICD implantation (T0), and at 1-year follow-up (T1) to assess QoL, depression and optimism, respectively. The patients were predominantly male (76.0%), with a median age of 67 years. Hemodialysis was the predominant mode of dialysis (70.2%). The GDS-15 score difference (T1 − T0) was 0.5 (2.1) in the ICD group compared with 0.3 (2.2) in the control group (mean difference − 0.3; 95% CI − 1.1 to 0.6; P = 0.58). The LOT-R score difference was − 0.2 (4.1) in the ICD group compared with − 1.5 (4.0) in the control group (mean difference − 1.1 (0.8); 95% CI − 2.6 to 0.4; P = 0.17). The mean difference scores of all subscales of the SF-36 were not significantly different between randomization groups. Conclusions In our population of patients on dialysis, ICD implantation did not affect QoL, mood or dispositional optimism significantly during 1-year follow-up. Clinical Trial Registration Unique identifier: ISRCTN20479861. http://www.controlled-trials.com.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 44%

“…refraining from enjoyed activities such as sports or hobbies, which in turn could lead to diminished QOL. Even partners of ICD patients can experience psychological distress levels as high as that of ICD-recipients [ 24 ]. An ICD shock can be experienced as extremely traumatizing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation on quality of life, depression and optimism in dialysis patients: report on the secondary outcome of QOL in the randomized controlled ICD2 trial

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In fact, hope predicted the quality of life in these patients. 17 Furthermore, hope was associated with functional, social, and emotional well-being, 18 depression symptoms, 39 depression, and self-esteem 19 in chronic conditions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…16 Hope predicted physical, psychological, social relationships and environmental domains of quality of life in hemodialysis patients. 17 In the same vein, hope predicted physical activity, disease threat appraisal, and all aspects of quality of life including physical, functional, emotional, and social well-being in chronic diseases such as cancer. 18 On the other hand, pain, depression, self-esteem, and functional status were found to be the predictors of hope in cancer patients.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

<p>Psychosocial, Spiritual, and Biomedical Predictors of Hope in Hemodialysis Patients</p>

Rambod¹,

Pasyar²,

Mokhtarizadeh³

2020

IJNRD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Hemodialysis patients deal with some psychological and social problems. These problems may be the predictors of hope. This study aimed to determine the psychosocial, spiritual, and biomedical predictors of hope in hemodialysis patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 350 hemodialysis patients in hemodialysis centers affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Adult Hope Scale, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, Personal Resources Questionnaire-85, Spiritual Well-Being Scale, and biomedical markers were used for data collection. The data were entered into the SPSS 22 software and were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis. Results: The mean score of hope was 28.54 (SD=5.27). The mean scores of depression, anxiety, and stress were 17.87 (SD=7.62), 13.12 (SD=3.47), and 12.99 (SD=3.88), respectively. The mean scores of social support and spiritual well-being were 126.35 (SD=17.53) and 74.02 (SD=5.84), respectively. The means of biomedical markers including interdialytic weight gain, urea nitrogen, creatinine, phosphate, sodium, and potassium were 2.10 (SD=1.04), 51.55 (SD=13.10), 6.98 (SD=2.48), 4.71 (SD=1.08), 139.32 (SD=4.91), and 4.87 (SD=0.93), respectively. The results revealed a significant association between hope and depression, anxiety, stress, social support, and spiritual well-being (p<0.05). In addition, stress (β=−0.14, p=0.01), anxiety (β=−0.20, p=0.002), and social support (β=0.49, p<0.001) were the predictors of hope. Conclusion: The hemodialysis patients reported moderate levels of hope, social support, anxiety, and depression. In addition, most of them adhered to dietary and fluid restrictions. Considering the association between hope and social support, spiritual well-being, anxiety, depression, and stress, using some interventions regarding the mentioned variables might increase hope among hemodialysis patients.

show abstract

A Psalm a Day: A Randomised Controlled Trial Examining the Effects of a 1-week, Daily Psalm Meditation on Hope, Flow and Wellbeing

Button

Pretto²

2023

Pastoral Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hope predicted quality of life in dyads of community-dwelling patients receiving hemodialysis and their family caregivers

Cited by 19 publications

References 28 publications

The impact of transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation on quality of life, depression and optimism in dialysis patients: report on the secondary outcome of QOL in the randomized controlled ICD2 trial

The impact of transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation on quality of life, depression and optimism in dialysis patients: report on the secondary outcome of QOL in the randomized controlled ICD2 trial

<p>Psychosocial, Spiritual, and Biomedical Predictors of Hope in Hemodialysis Patients</p>

A Psalm a Day: A Randomised Controlled Trial Examining the Effects of a 1-week, Daily Psalm Meditation on Hope, Flow and Wellbeing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About