2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.74.066008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hopf algebra structure of the AdS/CFTS-matrix

Abstract: We formulate the Hopf algebra underlying the su(2|2) worldsheet S-matrix of the AdS 5 × S 5 string in the AdS/CFT correspondence. For this we extend the previous construction in the su(1|2) subsector due to Janik to the full algebra by specifying the action of the coproduct and the antipode on the remaining generators. The nontriviality of the coproduct is determined by length-changing effects and results in an unusual central braiding. As an application we explicitly determine the antiparticle representation … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
143
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
143
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, not all Lie brackets have a uniform level: there is mixing between the levels. In comparison to the Hopf algebra symmetries of the S-matrix [9,10,17] which use the three-dimensional universal central extension of psu(2|2), here we have only one central extension C. The three central elements of psu(2|2) R 3 clearly have no dual partners (automorphisms) which would be needed for the standard construction of the classical r-matrix. Conversely, our central element C can be paired with the u(1) automorphism B of u(2|2) as in the proposal of [29], and we can construct a classical r-matrix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Secondly, not all Lie brackets have a uniform level: there is mixing between the levels. In comparison to the Hopf algebra symmetries of the S-matrix [9,10,17] which use the three-dimensional universal central extension of psu(2|2), here we have only one central extension C. The three central elements of psu(2|2) R 3 clearly have no dual partners (automorphisms) which would be needed for the standard construction of the classical r-matrix. Conversely, our central element C can be paired with the u(1) automorphism B of u(2|2) as in the proposal of [29], and we can construct a classical r-matrix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the modification of the summation bounds in (4.13) is crucial; without it some terms would remain. 10 …”
Section: Classical R-matrix and Cobracketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The meaning of this kinematical symmetry must be understood from the structure of the Hopf algebra symmetry [8,9,10,5,11,12]. In [8] the existence of a central Hopf subalgebra was noticed and the spectrum of this center was proposed as the rapidity plane.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%