2011
DOI: 10.1080/1553118x.2011.537603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Horizons in Strategic Communication: Theorising a Paradigm Shift

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that top down vertical interactions are necessary in order to allow managers that are located in the higher position to direct tasks to other employees. Thus, the location of the department close to senior management also means that this department often interacts directly with the CEO as it develops several tasks relevant for senior managers such as (1) text-based productions; (2) managing content and production of internal and external web sites; (3) consultation about means and media of communication; (4) coordination of communication projects; and (5) monitoring communication quality in accordance with Lurati and Eppler (2006); Mahoney (2011) and Moreno et al (2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that top down vertical interactions are necessary in order to allow managers that are located in the higher position to direct tasks to other employees. Thus, the location of the department close to senior management also means that this department often interacts directly with the CEO as it develops several tasks relevant for senior managers such as (1) text-based productions; (2) managing content and production of internal and external web sites; (3) consultation about means and media of communication; (4) coordination of communication projects; and (5) monitoring communication quality in accordance with Lurati and Eppler (2006); Mahoney (2011) and Moreno et al (2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, to discern about strategy and strategic communication, results to be rather complex, due to the polysemic character of the term, emphasized by many recent studies (Mahoney, 2011; Nothhaft, 2016; Nothaft et al , 2018; Zerfass et al , 2018). Its meaning has been separated in two: on the one hand, strategic communication is called traditional, and it is structured by rationality, prediction, manipulation, control and planning; on the other hand, strategic communication is defined as emergent and instead of presenting and disseminating strategy, it constructs it, by shaping the continuous interactions of all actors involved, in a process that embraces both learning and change (van Ruler, 2018).…”
Section: A Reality That Is Multidisciplinarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be said that detailed studies on strategic communication started in the 21st century, due to the need for application in rapidly changing and complex social environments. These environments, it is argued, are the ones where it is most appropriate to undertake these operations because they provide resources that allow the company to adapt and respond to a reality that is in constant evolution (Mahoney, 2011). Then, following a review of the literature, there are a variety of characteristics that define strategic communication:…”
Section: Strategic Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%