Horizontal alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant: long‐term results

Yamauchi, Kensuke; Takahashi, Tsuneo; Nogami, Shinnosuke; Kataoka, Yuki; Miyamoto, Ikuya; Funaki, Katsuyuki

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02417.x

Cited by 28 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These segments have been gradually separated by the process of distraction (5). ADO can be performed both horizontally (AHDO) and vertically (AVDO) (6,7).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant treatments of the vertical bone atrophy: A systematic review

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundTo determine if alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis obtains better results compared to other bone regeneration treatments (guided bone regeneration with membranes and / or filling material, or autogenous bone graft) in terms of bone gain, complications, and implant survival and success rates.Material and MethodsAn electronic search was performed in Pubmed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library and Scopus databases in March 2017. Besides, a manual search was carried out. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials published within the last 10 years with at least 1 year of follow-up after implant placement. No language restriction was applied. Exclusion criteria were studies in patients with bone defects produced by trauma, congenital malformation or oncologic surgical treatment. The methodological quality of the selected studies was evaluated by means of the Cochrane Collaboration’s Tool for assessing risk of bias. The reports were classified into different levels of recommendation according to the “Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy “.ResultsOut of 221 articles, two randomized controlled trials were finally selected for the inclusion in the systematic review. Bone gain and complications were higher with the alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis compared to the autologous bone graft. There was higher bone resorption with the autologous bone graft. Implant survival and success rates were similar between studies, despite of the used technique.ConclusionsBoth alveolar distraction osteogenesis and autogenous bone graft are effective bone regeneration techniques for the treatment of mandibular vertical bone atrophy. A level B recommendation can be established for the use of alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of the mandibular vertical bone atrophy. Key words:Distraction osteogenesis, alveolar ridge augmentation, alveolar bone loss.

show abstract

“…These segments have been gradually separated by the process of distraction (5). ADO can be performed both horizontally (AHDO) and vertically (AVDO) (6,7).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant treatments of the vertical bone atrophy: A systematic review

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This was substantiated by Saulacic et al described who described bone relapse of 26-29% with the use of an intraosseous semirigid distractor [41]. However a long-term implant survival rate for oral rehabilitation was noticed [43].The use of sinus lifting along with alveolar distraction for pre-implant reconstruction has also been seen. This brought about the limitations.…”

Section: Weeks After Consolidationmentioning

confidence: 64%

Distraction Osteogenesis in Implantology for Ridge Augmentation - A Systematic Review

Sumra¹,

Kulshrestha²

2017

Dent Implants Dentures

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate distraction osteogenesis for ridge augmentation in implant dentistry and also to present the associated advantages and limitations. A Medline and manual search was conducted to identify clinical studies concerning distraction osteogenesis in implant dentistry published between 1998 to 2012. 52 articles were assessed. The articles included evaluated the type of distractor used, augmentation achieved and the success and survival rate of implant placed in the augmented site. It was seen that when comparing methods of regeneration, a decreased treatment time is seen in cases of distraction osteogenesis. The reason for this lies in the fact that within 12 weeks the distraction segments are formed and there is a increase noted in the height of the alveolar bone, from 5 to 15 mm as well as an implant survival rate of 95.7%. It can be concluded that distraction osteogenesis is a relatively simple, effective and reliable technique for alveolar ridge reconstruction in contemporary implant dentistry. It can be considered versatile owing to its simplicity, possibility of avoiding bone grafts, infections and blood transfusions. The fact that graft and membrane exposure or inadequate tissue coverage do not pose complications, makes this an effective method of bone augmentation in implantology.

show abstract

“…The ultimate aim for alveolar ridge augmentation is to increase the alveolar vertical height and horizontal width prior to dental implant rehabilitation. 11,12 In alveolar distraction, vector control is important as it determines the final position of the transport segment prior to dental implant placement. Apart from using an internal device with adjustable distraction body angle, temporary denture ( Figure 1A) or orthodontic wire can be used to act as a support to prevent the transport segment from tilting lingually or palatally.…”

Section: Alveolar Distractionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technical Issues in Craniomaxillofacial Distraction Osteogenesis: A Case Series

Adam

Hariri

Cheung

et al. 2018

imjm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Distraction osteogenesis allows superior skeletal advancement compared to conventional surgical osteotomy. It can be considered as a reliable and predictable surgical procedure and is widely used to correct the craniomaxillofacial bone discrepancy. Nevertheless, the outcome is technically dependent and requires comprehensive peri-operative assessment, preparation, and precision in application. The objective of this study is to highlight some important technical issues in distraction osteogenesis when the technique is indicated in various craniomaxillofacial regions and at the same time to discuss the options of preventing and overcoming these technical complications based on our experience and relevant literature. Important technical issues on the application of distraction osteogenesis in 5 different craniomaxillofacial regions were selectively highlighted based on the completed cases in one centre. Potential complications and its prevention methods were documented and discussed. The 5 highlighted regions of craniomaxillofacial distraction osteogenesis were alveolar, mandibular, cleft maxilla, craniofacial and facial cleft. Technical issues and complications were mostly device related and associated with anatomical limitations and surgical technique. Nevertheless, these complications are preventable and can be appropriately managed. From the literature and our experience, the technical aspects vary according to its application in different craniomaxillofacial regions. Preventing the potential complications contribute to the success of its application. This article also discussed the concept of Ihsan application in the medical field, to achieve the best of treatment in terms of delivery and technical preparation for the patients.

show abstract

Horizontal alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant: long‐term results

Cited by 28 publications

References 26 publications

Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant treatments of the vertical bone atrophy: A systematic review

Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant treatments of the vertical bone atrophy: A systematic review

Distraction Osteogenesis in Implantology for Ridge Augmentation - A Systematic Review

Technical Issues in Craniomaxillofacial Distraction Osteogenesis: A Case Series

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About