2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Horizontal vibration of a cylindrical rigid foundation embedded in poroelastic half-space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To better describe the dynamic characteristics of the partially embedded foundation subjected to horizontal loads, the horizontal dynamic response factor in dimensionless form M h is defined as 14,15,18 : Mhbadbreak=1()kBha022c2$$\begin{equation}{M_h} = \frac{1}{{\sqrt {{{\left( {k - {B_h}a_0^2} \right)}^2} - {c^2}} }}\end{equation}$$…”
Section: An Approximate Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To better describe the dynamic characteristics of the partially embedded foundation subjected to horizontal loads, the horizontal dynamic response factor in dimensionless form M h is defined as 14,15,18 : Mhbadbreak=1()kBha022c2$$\begin{equation}{M_h} = \frac{1}{{\sqrt {{{\left( {k - {B_h}a_0^2} \right)}^2} - {c^2}} }}\end{equation}$$…”
Section: An Approximate Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic coupled interaction model of the surrounding soil‐cylindrical rigid foundation system was lucubrated based on the Novak plane strain model, whose precision and accuracy has been verified by many scholars 14,15,18 . At this stage, the potential functions and variable separation method are introduced into solving the vibration equations of saturated soil, so the dimensionless displacements of the surrounding soil in the radial and tangential direction can be easily written: urbadbreak=()badbreak−F1Ω1goodbreak−F2Ω2+F3Ω3cosθ$$\begin{equation}{u^{\prime}_r} = \left( { - {F_1}{\Omega _1} - {F_2}{\Omega _2} + {F_3}{\Omega _3}} \right)\cos \theta \end{equation}$$ uθbadbreak=()badbreak−F1Ω4goodbreak−F21.0ptΩ5+F3Ω6sinθ$$\begin{equation}{u^{\prime}_\theta } = \left( { - {F_1}{\Omega _4} - {F_2}{\kern 1pt} {\Omega _5} + {F_3}{\Omega _6}} \right)\sin \theta \end{equation}$$ wrbadbreak=()badbreak−F1γ1Ω1goodbreak−F2γ2Ω2+F3γ3Ω3cosθ$$\begin{equation}{w^{\prime}_r} = \left( { - {F_1}{\gamma _1}{\Omega _1} - {F_2}{\gamma _2}{\Omega _2} + {F_3}{\gamma _3}{\Omega _3}} \right)\cos \theta \end{equation}$$where the constants F 1 , F 2 and F 3 need to be solved by the following boundary conditions; both K 0 (…) and K 2 (…) denote the modified Bessel functions.…”
Section: An Approximate Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations