Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
This paper examines the behavior of heavy oil reservoirs developed with horizontal and multilateral wells. Advanced decline curve analyses were used to characterize flow regimes and estimate the time to pseudosteady-state. Reservoir and well parameters such as the OOIP, Arps "b" exponent, decline rate, reserves, permeability and well productivity indices were also determined. Example analyses are presented for single, dual and triple lateral wells from heavy oil fields located in Venezuela and Canada. All wells exhibit a characteristic extended transient linear flow regime followed by an exponential decline. Similar results were obtained whether the analyses were performed on single, dual or triple lateral wells. Interference between laterals was not observed. Introduction The application of horizontal and multilateral wells is gaining momentum worldwide due to their ability to drain reservoirs more effectively. This advantage is even more pronounced in tight gas or heavy oil reservoirs where low mobility is responsible for long transient flow periods. The relatively new application of these exotic well geometries to such reservoirs provides a challenge in the area of production forecasting because traditional methods and equations were developed based on flow to a vertical well. This paper demonstrates the use of rate-time performance analyses on heavy oil reservoirs developed with horizontal and multilateral wells. Well productivity indices (PI) were calculated from the transient production period by matching the rate-time data to type curves. Permeability-thickness or the equivalent skin factor was calculated based on this PI. Hydrocarbon volume connected to the well, the Arps "b" exponent and the decline rate were calculated from the pseudosteady-state producing period. The decline curve results were also verified using a reservoir simulation flow model. Decline curve analysis was performed on the rate versus time values generated by the flow model to confirm that the model had similar transient and depletion behavior as the actual performance data. Decline Curve Analysis Concepts When a well is first opened to flow, it produces under transient flow conditions. It will remain under this condition until the production from the well affects the entire drainage area. This flow condition is referred to as pseudosteady-state or boundary dominated flow. Transient rate and pressure data are used to calculate permeability-thickness and skin, whereas pseudosteady-state data are used to determine connected OOIP. Constant well pressure solutions used to predict declining production rates as a function of time were first published in 1933 by Moore, Schilthius, and Hurst.[1] Results were presented for infinite, slightly compressible, single phase plane radial systems. The results were presented in graphical form in terms of dimensionless flow rate and dimensionless time as shown in Figure 1.
This paper examines the behavior of heavy oil reservoirs developed with horizontal and multilateral wells. Advanced decline curve analyses were used to characterize flow regimes and estimate the time to pseudosteady-state. Reservoir and well parameters such as the OOIP, Arps "b" exponent, decline rate, reserves, permeability and well productivity indices were also determined. Example analyses are presented for single, dual and triple lateral wells from heavy oil fields located in Venezuela and Canada. All wells exhibit a characteristic extended transient linear flow regime followed by an exponential decline. Similar results were obtained whether the analyses were performed on single, dual or triple lateral wells. Interference between laterals was not observed. Introduction The application of horizontal and multilateral wells is gaining momentum worldwide due to their ability to drain reservoirs more effectively. This advantage is even more pronounced in tight gas or heavy oil reservoirs where low mobility is responsible for long transient flow periods. The relatively new application of these exotic well geometries to such reservoirs provides a challenge in the area of production forecasting because traditional methods and equations were developed based on flow to a vertical well. This paper demonstrates the use of rate-time performance analyses on heavy oil reservoirs developed with horizontal and multilateral wells. Well productivity indices (PI) were calculated from the transient production period by matching the rate-time data to type curves. Permeability-thickness or the equivalent skin factor was calculated based on this PI. Hydrocarbon volume connected to the well, the Arps "b" exponent and the decline rate were calculated from the pseudosteady-state producing period. The decline curve results were also verified using a reservoir simulation flow model. Decline curve analysis was performed on the rate versus time values generated by the flow model to confirm that the model had similar transient and depletion behavior as the actual performance data. Decline Curve Analysis Concepts When a well is first opened to flow, it produces under transient flow conditions. It will remain under this condition until the production from the well affects the entire drainage area. This flow condition is referred to as pseudosteady-state or boundary dominated flow. Transient rate and pressure data are used to calculate permeability-thickness and skin, whereas pseudosteady-state data are used to determine connected OOIP. Constant well pressure solutions used to predict declining production rates as a function of time were first published in 1933 by Moore, Schilthius, and Hurst.[1] Results were presented for infinite, slightly compressible, single phase plane radial systems. The results were presented in graphical form in terms of dimensionless flow rate and dimensionless time as shown in Figure 1.
Low permeability porous carbonate rocks occupy a certain proportion in the Middle East. Horizontal injection-production well pattern development is often adopted. Due to the influence of well type and wellbore, reservoir dynamic monitoring is mainly based on conventional daily measurement data, well test and pressure monitoring. Therefore, it is particularly important to combine well test interpretation with production dynamic analysis to diagnose the main control factors and production characteristics of this type of reservoir. In this paper, the point source function is used to obtain the pressure variation function of a horizontal well in infinite formation with upper and lower closed boundary. The difference between the horizontal well test curve of A reservoir and the typical horizontal well test curve is compared and analyzed, and the abnormal well test curve of horizontal wells is characterized by a linear flow phase with a slope of 1/3 or 1/4. The abnormal well test curve accounted for 33.34%. The main influencing factors are the permeability around the well and the well trajectory. By combining well test interpretation with dynamic inversion method, the correlation between well test interpretation and dynamic characteristics of horizontal wells with different characteristics is classified and clarified. The main controlling factors that affect the difference in the water injection development effect of different horizontal wells are further clarified, and provide an important reference for the adjustment of injection-production parameters and the optimal deployment of schemes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.