2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hormonal induction of ovulation and artificial insemination in suckled beef cows under nutritional stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weaning lasting 72 h can improve LH release and pregnancy rate during MOET programs [ 172 ]. A 96-h weaning procedure led to higher pregnancy rates in beef cattle when combined with FTAI involving GnRH, estradiol and an intravaginal device [ 173 ]. Another technique to shorten postpartum anestrus in beef cattle when performing reproductive biotechnologies is to administer estradiol.…”
Section: Beef Cattle Stress and Reproductive Biotechnologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Weaning lasting 72 h can improve LH release and pregnancy rate during MOET programs [ 172 ]. A 96-h weaning procedure led to higher pregnancy rates in beef cattle when combined with FTAI involving GnRH, estradiol and an intravaginal device [ 173 ]. Another technique to shorten postpartum anestrus in beef cattle when performing reproductive biotechnologies is to administer estradiol.…”
Section: Beef Cattle Stress and Reproductive Biotechnologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anestrus inhibits LH release, preventing ovulation despite the presence of GnRH. Estradiol promotes LH release, improving outcomes of FTAI in beef cattle [ 157 , 173 ]. Nevertheless, estradiol administration is illegal in some countries.…”
Section: Beef Cattle Stress and Reproductive Biotechnologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, changes in energy reserves during the postpartum period and body condition score (BCS; i.e. 1 = emaciated and 5 = fat) at the time of breeding are also known to affect reproductive performance (Bossis et al, 2000;Ciccioli et al, 2003;de Medeiros-Bastos et al, 2004). Lactating beef cows with moderate BCS (BCS = 3) have a greater response to an oestrus induction treatment and greater pregnancy percentage than cows with poor BCS (BCS = 2; de Medeiros-Bastos et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 = emaciated and 5 = fat) at the time of breeding are also known to affect reproductive performance (Bossis et al, 2000;Ciccioli et al, 2003;de Medeiros-Bastos et al, 2004). Lactating beef cows with moderate BCS (BCS = 3) have a greater response to an oestrus induction treatment and greater pregnancy percentage than cows with poor BCS (BCS = 2; de Medeiros-Bastos et al, 2004). In agreement, beef cows gaining 0.90 kg of BW daily during the first 71 days postpartum had shorter anoestrus intervals (100 ± 7 days) than cows gaining only 0.45 kg/day (120 ± 7 days; Ciccioli et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%