1974
DOI: 10.1507/endocrj1954.21.267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hormonal Regulation of Protein Synthesis in Rat Ventral Prostate

Abstract: SHOGO ICHII, MASAO IZAWA AND NORIKO MURAKAMI SynopsisTo elucidate details of hormonal regulation mechanism in rat ventral prostate, synthesis of RNAs that contain polyadenylate sequences, polyribosomal sedimentation profile, ribosomal capacity of 3H-Met-tRNA binding, ribosomal initiation factor activity and the rate of polypeptide chain elongation were examined in the ventral prostate from control and castrated animals. The following results were obtained ;1) The concentration of RNAs that contain polyadenylat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this result, the hormone-receptor complex which binds to DNA and nuclei would not be required for the action of dihydrotestosterone on the rat ventral prostate. Lack of tissue specificity in the binding of hormone-receptor complex to isolated nuclei has been reported Chamness et al, 1973;Ichii, 1975) and the high affinity and saturable binding of dexamethasone-receptor complex to liver nuclei has not been observed in the in vitro binding experiment (Ichii, et al, 1977). On the other hand, the interaction of glucocorticoids and liver cytosol with liver nuclei was postulated to be tissue specific (Milgrom and Atiger, 1975) and a specific high affinity binding of steroid-receptor complexes has also been reported (Kalimi et al, 1973Chatkoff and Julian, 1973).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this result, the hormone-receptor complex which binds to DNA and nuclei would not be required for the action of dihydrotestosterone on the rat ventral prostate. Lack of tissue specificity in the binding of hormone-receptor complex to isolated nuclei has been reported Chamness et al, 1973;Ichii, 1975) and the high affinity and saturable binding of dexamethasone-receptor complex to liver nuclei has not been observed in the in vitro binding experiment (Ichii, et al, 1977). On the other hand, the interaction of glucocorticoids and liver cytosol with liver nuclei was postulated to be tissue specific (Milgrom and Atiger, 1975) and a specific high affinity binding of steroid-receptor complexes has also been reported (Kalimi et al, 1973Chatkoff and Julian, 1973).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resultant DHT-receptor complexes become translocated to the nucleus where they are apportioned to various regions of nuclear chromatin defined by the presence of specific acceptor sites. Although effects of androgens at extranuclear sites cannot be excluded (Ichii, Izawa & Murakami, 1974;Liang & Liao, 1975), alterations in transcriptional events brought about by the arrival of DHT-receptor complexes at the acceptor sites seem to reflect the major area of influence. Prostate chromatin responds to this occurrence with alterations in the activity of RNA polymerase (EC 2.7.7.6, nucleosidetriphosphate : RNA nucleotidyltransferase) (Davies & Griffiths, 1974;Hu, Loor & Wang, 1975;Mainwaring & Jones, 1975; Thomas, , followed by increased synthesis of various essential cellular macromolecules (see Mainwaring, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of androgen receptors in prostatic cytoplasm and nucleus (King «fe Mainwaring, 1974;Liao «fe Liang, 1974;Bruchovsky, Lesser, Van Doom «fe Craven, 1975a), and their postulated involvement in transcriptional (Davies «fe Griffiths, 1973Griffiths, , 1974 Davies, 1975;Hu, Loor & Wang, 1975;Mainwaring «fe Jones, 1975; Davies, Thomas & Griffiths, 1976) and post-transcriptional (Ichii, Izawa «fe Murakami, 1974;Liang & Liao, 1975) processes, has emphasized the desirability of a more complete quantitative assessment of ligand reten¬ tion and ligand-receptor interaction. Such an approach might define the imprecise relation¬ ship of cytoplasmic and nuclear receptors (Bruchovsky, Rennie & Vanson, 19756) and clarify the involvement of receptors in synthesis of macromolecules (Davies et al 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%