1978
DOI: 10.1071/bi9780395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hormone Receptor Levels and Metabolic Activity in the Uterus of the Ewe: Regulation by Oestradiol and Progesterone

Abstract: Oestradiol and progesterone were administered alone or together in various combinations to different groups of ovariectomized ewes and several aspects of uterine and endometrial metabolism were determined. Levels of cytosol receptors for oestradiol and progesterone and metabolism of these steroids in whole uterus were measured, as well as mean cell content of RNA, rate of protein synthesis, tissue DNA concentration and alkaline phosphatase activity in the endometrium, uterine weight, and the amount of protein … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An explanation for the difference between these results may lie in the techniques applied (isoelectric focussing, Roberts et al, 1976; SDS-PAGE size separation, present study), or in the failure of the technique used to resolve labelled proteins destined for export; the majority of proteins labelled were confined to tissue and were not recovered in the supernatant. Uterine tissues from pregnant or non-pregnant ewes, or from ovariectomized ewes treated with ovarian steroids, showed negligible metabolism of androstenedione to phenolic compounds, a finding noted previously (Rossier & Pierrepoint, 1974;Murphy, Stone, Miller & Moore, 1977;Stone, Murphy & Miller, 1978). Both oestradiol-17ß (Greiss & Miller, 1971;Anderson, Hackshaw, Still & Greiss, 1977) and the presence of a conceptus (Greiss & Anderson, 1970) increased uterine blood flow at Days 13-15 of pregnancy in sheep.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…An explanation for the difference between these results may lie in the techniques applied (isoelectric focussing, Roberts et al, 1976; SDS-PAGE size separation, present study), or in the failure of the technique used to resolve labelled proteins destined for export; the majority of proteins labelled were confined to tissue and were not recovered in the supernatant. Uterine tissues from pregnant or non-pregnant ewes, or from ovariectomized ewes treated with ovarian steroids, showed negligible metabolism of androstenedione to phenolic compounds, a finding noted previously (Rossier & Pierrepoint, 1974;Murphy, Stone, Miller & Moore, 1977;Stone, Murphy & Miller, 1978). Both oestradiol-17ß (Greiss & Miller, 1971;Anderson, Hackshaw, Still & Greiss, 1977) and the presence of a conceptus (Greiss & Anderson, 1970) increased uterine blood flow at Days 13-15 of pregnancy in sheep.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In both experiments, the number of unfilled sites in ovariectomized ewes was increased within 24 hr after an injection of estradiol. Estradiol-induced replenishment of estradiol binding sites has been reported for ovine endometrium (Koligian and Stormshak, 1977a) and for whole uterus (Stone et al, 1978). Estradiol injections also increased unfilled binding sites in nuclei at 24 hr in Exp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…1. This con-firms, for myometrium, that estradiol increases progestogen binding in cytoplasm and whole uterus (Stone et al, 1978). Progesterone not only decreased estrogen binding receptor replenishment but also reduced concentrations of progestogen binding sites in cytoplasm and nuclei.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In the ewe, the concentration of oestrogen receptors is influenced largely by circulating levels of oestrogen and pro¬ gesterone (Stone, Murphy & Miller, 1978). As the ewes in our previous study were ovariectomized, the differences in the concentrations of receptors may have been the result of differences in the concen¬ trations of extragonadal steroids, presumably of adrenal origin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%