1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5122(99)00035-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hormone replacement therapy in perimenopausal women and 2-year change of carotid intima-media thickness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the assessment of CIMT progression rates, studies were excluded when they were not placebo controlled 27,30,32,34,36,37,46,47,50,54 or when change in CIMT over time was not reported, eg, when only the differences in CIMT progression between the treatment and placebo groups were reported and not the group-specific estimates. 40 When a RCT had Ͼ1 report on CIMT progression rates, we included the report with the longest follow-up time or when the SE of the CIMT change estimate was not given. 43 Information that was retrieved from the articles included author, year of publication, type of intervention, mean age, sex, presence of cardiovascular disease, LDL and HDL levels, systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and whether a qualifying lesion was needed for enrollment.…”
Section: Estimates Of Annual Cimt Progression Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the assessment of CIMT progression rates, studies were excluded when they were not placebo controlled 27,30,32,34,36,37,46,47,50,54 or when change in CIMT over time was not reported, eg, when only the differences in CIMT progression between the treatment and placebo groups were reported and not the group-specific estimates. 40 When a RCT had Ͼ1 report on CIMT progression rates, we included the report with the longest follow-up time or when the SE of the CIMT change estimate was not given. 43 Information that was retrieved from the articles included author, year of publication, type of intervention, mean age, sex, presence of cardiovascular disease, LDL and HDL levels, systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and whether a qualifying lesion was needed for enrollment.…”
Section: Estimates Of Annual Cimt Progression Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are no trials with clinical endpoints to corroborate this concept. We and other workers have recently shown that HRT does not slow progression of carotid atherosclerosis in clinically healthy women [7,25]. Pooled data from randomized trials that focused mostly on bone-related outcome measures in primarily healthy women showed a non-significantly higher odds ratio for cardiovascular events in women taking HRT compared with those taking placebo [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Quantitative coronary angiography used in WELL-HART is a measure of symptomatic late stage atherosclerosis, whereas carotid artery wall thickness used in EPAT evaluates asymptomatic early subclinical atherosclerosis [27]. Common carotid artery IMT was used in a study of 121 perimenopausal women with a mean age of 47 years who were randomized to receive 0.625 mg of oral CEE daily and 0.15 mg of norgestrel on days 17 through 28; 1.5 mg of micronized oral 17 -estradiol daily and 0.15 mg of desogestrel on days 17 through 24, with four matched placebo pills taken on days 25 through 28; or placebo only [28]. After 2 years of treatment, women randomized to HT showed a reduction in the progression of common carotid artery IMT, compared with placebo [28].…”
Section: Discord Between Rcts and Observational Studies Of Postmenopamentioning
confidence: 99%