2009
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Horn type and horn length genes map to the same chromosomal region in Soay sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
64
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 2 ( RXFP2 ) gene on ovine autosome 10 (OAR-10: 29491481 – 29538132 bp) is located in a known selected genomic region linked to the horn morphology in sheep [11,56,57]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 2 ( RXFP2 ) gene on ovine autosome 10 (OAR-10: 29491481 – 29538132 bp) is located in a known selected genomic region linked to the horn morphology in sheep [11,56,57]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As linkage maps of bighorn sheep and domestic sheep are very similar (Poissant et al, 2010b), we adopted significance thresholds previously calculated for domestic sheep by Johnston et al (2010) based on the formula from Lander and Kruglyak (1995). QTL were therefore considered suggestive and significant when LOD scores were 41.88 and 3.31, respectively.…”
Section: Qtl Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, a QTL was considered to be colocalized between species when a position with LOD 41.175 in bighorn sheep was located within the 95% confidence interval of a significant domestic sheep QTL. This approach is valid for horn size because only one QTL has been mapped for this trait in domestic sheep to date (that is, on chromosome 10 near the horns locus, Johnston et al, 2010). On the other hand, it is anticonservative for body mass because of the large number of QTLs that have been mapped in domestic sheep for this trait.…”
Section: Qtl Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, many empirical studies have successfully utilised pedigree information derived from physical tagging, genetic data or a combination of both approaches, to test a wide range of evolutionary and ecological hypotheses in the wild for various taxa [2,6]. Such studies have provided insights on the long term response of populations to environmental change [7], the effect of inbreeding depression in small or introduced populations [8,9], the elucidation of mating systems [10,11], the estimation of the variance components of life history traits [12,13], and the detection of QTLs [14,15]. However, in species with external fertilisation and limited post-hatching parental care, the construction of pedigrees through observational means is limited by the inability to physically mark individuals and/or monitor parent-offspring associations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%