1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2541(98)00078-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hornblende dissolution kinetics at 25°C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The interpretation presented above differs from that of Frogner and Schweda (1998), who observed a temporal slowing of hornblende dissolution rates. Frogner and Schweda (1998) argued that the reconstruction of surfaces after preferential metal release was responsible for the observed slowing of dissolution rates.…”
contrasting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interpretation presented above differs from that of Frogner and Schweda (1998), who observed a temporal slowing of hornblende dissolution rates. Frogner and Schweda (1998) argued that the reconstruction of surfaces after preferential metal release was responsible for the observed slowing of dissolution rates.…”
contrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Frogner and Schweda (1998) argued that the reconstruction of surfaces after preferential metal release was responsible for the observed slowing of dissolution rates. The preferential release of aluminum during hornblende dissolution at pH 3.0 leads to a leached layer of more than 50 nm in depth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of studies have focused on hornblende dissolution rates at ambient temperatures (Nickel, 1973;Cygan et al, 1989;Sverdrup, 1990;Swoboda-Colberg and Drever, 1993;Zhang, 1990;Zhang et al, 1993Zhang et al, , 1996Frogner and Schweda, 1998;Golubev et al, 2005;Givens and Brantley, unpublished 2 ). A limited number of studies have investigated the dissolution rates of other amphiboles including anthophyllite (Mast and Drever, 1987 at 22°C;Chen and Brantley, 1998) and tremolite (Schott et al, 1981;Rozalen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Comparison Of Retrieved Actinolite and Chlorite Rates With Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6.34) to the data by either linear or non-linear techniques. Since the (Frogner and Schweda, 1998) data appear to diverge from the remainder of the data, we have treated them separately. The remainder of the data was fit together with the (Cygan et al, 1989) data excluded due to unusual aspects of experimental protocol.…”
Section: Linear Fitting Of Log Transformed Data Versus Non-linear Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%