QUESTION ASKED: How do survival and health care utilization differ for older patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer after treatment with two distinct first-line chemotherapy regimens: cisplatin/etoposide versus carboplatin/etoposide? SUMMARY ANSWER: Survival after each regimen was nearly identical, but patients who received carboplatin/etoposide used less subsequent hospital-based health care than similar patients who received cisplatin/etoposide.
WHAT WE DID:We identified patients with a first cancer diagnosis of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer from the SEER cancer registries, which include detailed tumor information. Then using linked Medicare claims, we identified additional clinical details, cancer treatments, post-treatment health care utilization, and survival. We limited our study to patients who received first-line cisplatin/etoposide or carboplatin/etoposide in the outpatient setting. Each patient who received cisplatin/etoposide was matched to two patients who received carboplatin/etoposide using propensity scores that balanced demographic factors such as age, sex, and SEER region and clinical factors such as cancer characteristics, prior non-chemotherapy cancer treatments, prior health care utilization, and comorbidities. We compared post-treatment survival using non-inferiority tests and post-treatment health care utilization using conventional hypothesis tests.WHAT WE FOUND: Survival after cisplatin/etoposide was 35.7 weeks and after carboplatin/ etoposide was 35.9 weeks; statistical tests demonstrated that survival after carboplatin/etoposide was non-inferior to cisplatin/etoposide. After treatment, patients who received carboplatin/ etoposide were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (80% v 86%), but not the ICU or ED. They also had fewer hospitalizations, ICU stays, and ED visits, but lengths of stay (for those who were hospitalized) were not different between the two treatment groups.
BIAS, CONFOUNDING FACTOR(S), REAL-LIFE IMPLICATIONS:Ideally, patients and physicians tailor treatments to individual clinical and personal characteristics. Treatment selection biases naïve comparisons between treatments when these characteristics also predict outcomes. For example, in our unmatched sample, patients who received cisplatin/ etoposide were younger and healthier. Although our matching method nearly eliminated the observable differences between the two treatment groups, unobservable differences may remain. For example, patients who received cisplatin/etoposide may have preferred more aggressive treatment or had oncologists who preferred more aggressive treatment. Our sample restrictions, designed to make our comparisons more valid, limit the population to which we can generalize our conclusions. Our results apply only to Traditional Medicare enrollees with 2 years of continuous enrollment in Parts A and B diagnosed with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer as a first cancer who receive first-line chemotherapy in the ambulatory setting. Despite clinical practice guidelines that cont...