More than 20 years ago, a group of prominent scholars observed that "American health care is in a state of hyper-turbulence characterized by accumulated waves of change in payment systems, delivery systems, technology, professional relations, and societal expectations" (Shortell, Gillies, and Devers 1995). Likening this turmoil to an earthquake, they argued that the epicenter was the hospital. Today, the hospital remains in a state of transition. Shaping the conceptual contours of these changes is the oft-mentioned "triple aim," which identifies improving the health of surrounding communities, enhancing patient experience, and reducing the per capita cost of care as key goals of American health care (Halvorson, Tanski, and Yackel 2017; Whittington et al. 2015). Although health care scholars have written extensively on the triple aim and its goals, sociologists have rarely considered the dramatic impact these changes could have on how we understand hospitals as urban institutions. This is curious considering the sociological tradition of studying hospitals as sites for professional socialization and the enactment of medical hierarchies. Charles Bosk (2014), in his Leo G. Reeder address, awarded by the medical sociology section of the American Sociological Association, emphasized the significance of the hospital as a lab for sociological research: