2018
DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000002829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hospital Differences Drive Antibiotic Delays for Black Patients Compared With White Patients With Suspected Septic Shock

Abstract: Black patients appear to be less likely than white patients to receive timely antibiotic therapy for sepsis. These differences were largely explained by variation in care among hospitals, such that hospitals that disproportionately treat black patients were less likely to provide timely antibiotic therapy overall. There were no differences between races in other sepsis quality measures or adjusted mortality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we did not analyze the impact of patient characteristics, such as race or ethnicity, on timeliness of care, other studies have found that nonwhite patients may be subject to assessment and treatment delays in the ED. 18,19 If similar trends hold true in our sample, it is possible that our study underestimates the magnitude of difference in high-acuity care timeliness between FREDs and HEDs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While we did not analyze the impact of patient characteristics, such as race or ethnicity, on timeliness of care, other studies have found that nonwhite patients may be subject to assessment and treatment delays in the ED. 18,19 If similar trends hold true in our sample, it is possible that our study underestimates the magnitude of difference in high-acuity care timeliness between FREDs and HEDs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Of note, as previously demonstrated, 11 we found that the baseline characteristics of patient visits to FREDs and HEDs were different, with FREDs tending to serve fewer minority patients. While we did not analyze the impact of patient characteristics, such as race or ethnicity, on timeliness of care, other studies have found that nonwhite patients may be subject to assessment and treatment delays in the ED 18,19 . If similar trends hold true in our sample, it is possible that our study underestimates the magnitude of difference in high‐acuity care timeliness between FREDs and HEDs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Among patients admitted to the ICU for sepsis, uninsured patients experience a shorter length of stay, receive less interventions, and have inferior clinical outcomes compared to insured patients [40,42]. Lacking insurance is also associated with greater use of low-quality hospitals that fail to deliver guideline-adherent therapy [63,68,69].…”
Section: Hospital-based Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several possible explanations for why racial minorities experience disparate outcomes in sepsis, including access to care, comorbidities, implicit biases, and biological or environmental factors, 17‐20 as well as characteristics of hospitals most likely to care for racial minorities 13,15,21 . One explanation that has not been explored is that racial disparities in sepsis are mediated by language.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%