Hospital funding reforms in Canada: a narrative review of Ontario and Quebec strategies

Abstract

Background In the early 2000s, Ontario and Quebec, two provinces of Canada, began to introduce hospital payment reforms to improve quality and access to care. This paper (1) critically reviews patient-based funding (PBF) implementation approaches used by Quebec and Ontario over 15 years, and (2) identifies factors that support or limit PBF implementation to inform future decisions regarding the use of PBF models in both provinces. Methods We adopted a narrative review approach to document and critically analyse Quebec and Ontario experiences with the implementation of patient-based funding. We searched for documents in the scientific and grey literature and contacted key stakeholders to identify relevant policy documents. Results Both provinces targeted similar hospital services—aligned with nationwide policy goals—fulfilling in part patient-based funding programmes’ objectives. We identified four factors that played a role in ensuring the successful—or not—implementation of these strategies: (1) adoption supports, (2) alignment with programme objectives, (3) funding incentives and (4) stakeholder engagement. Conclusions This review provides lessons in the complexity of implementing hospital payment reforms. Implementation is enabled by adoption supports and funding incentives that align with policy objectives and by engaging stakeholders in the design of incentives.

Comparison of Fracture Identification Using Different Definitions in Healthcare Administrative (Claims) Data

“…However, we also acknowledge the possibility of 'code creep' or 'upcoding', a phenomenon in which physicians bill for more expensive procedures over time, as this has previously been documented in outpatient clinics in Ontario [22]. However, code creep has not been documented in Ontario hospitals [23]. Indeed, the rates of hip replacements in our study remained constant over our study period.…”

Population-based integrated care funding values and guiding principles: An empirical qualitative study

“…While we did not aim to examine differences in the prioritization of prevailing values across jurisdictions, nor unpack the decision-making process itself , such variation could be present and be in part responsible for variation in the timing of introduction and in the characteristics of integrated care funding policies implemented across jurisdictions. Further comparative studies are thus warranted to better understand the mechanisms behind the development of integrated care funding policy, as well as to explore barriers and enablers to their implementation (as already available for other funding approaches [ 48 ]).…”

Selecting performance indicators for hospital pharmacy practice: A Canadian initiative

“…With the pressure of demand-supply balance increasing on the healthcare system, hospital activity-based funding, or 'pay-per-performance', is growing in popularity among governing administrations. [1][2][3][4] Under activitybased funding, hospitals are paid a predefined amount of money for each patient. 5,6 This is based on patients' specific conditions and factors that may add complexity or cost to their care.…”