Hospital Quality and Medicare Expenditures for Bariatric Surgery in the United States

Abstract

Objective: To examine the relationship between hospital outcomes and expenditures in patients undergoing bariatric surgery in the United States Summary Background Data: As one of the most common surgical procedures in the United States, bariatric surgery is a major focus of policy reforms aimed at reducing surgical costs. These policy mechanisms have made it imperative to understand the potential cost savings of quality improvement initiatives. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 38,374 Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgery between 2011 and 2013. We ranked hospitals into quintiles by their risk- and reliability-adjusted post-operative serious complications. We then examined the relationship between upper and lower outcome quintiles with risk-adjusted, total episode payments. Additionally, we stratified patients by their risk (low, medium, high) of developing a complication to understand how this impacted payment. Results: We found a strong correlation between hospital complication rates and episode payments. For example, hospitals in the lowest quintile of complication rates had average total episode payments that were $1,321 per patient less than hospitals in the highest quintile ($11,112 versus $12,433, P<0.005). Cost savings was more prominent amongst high risk patients where the difference of total episode payments per patient between lowest and highest quintile hospitals was $2,160 ($12,960 versus $15,120; P<0.005). In addition to total episode payment savings, hospitals with the lowest complication rates also had decreased costs for index hospitalization, readmissions, physician services and post-discharge ancillary care compared to hospitals with the highest complication rates. Conclusions: Medicare payments for bariatric surgery are significantly lower at hospitals with low complication rates. These findings suggest that efforts to improve bariatric surgical quality may ultimately help reduce costs. Additionally, these cost savings may be most prominent amongst the patients at the highest risk for complications.

Hospital quality, patient risk, and Medicare expenditures for cancer surgery

“…As in previous analyses, we used the predicted total payment for each patient as the risk‐adjusted payment with a linear mixed model that controlled for a patient's age, sex, and race and 29 Elixhauser comorbidities. We calculated the average risk‐adjusted payment for each hospital and then reported the average of these risk‐adjusted hospital payments by quality quintiles.…”

Population level outcomes and costs of single stage colon and liver resection versus conventional two-stage approach for the resection of metastatic colorectal cancer

“…This methodological approach has been utilized and validated in previous studies. 20,21 To further account for any residual confounding, propensity scores were used to match patients undergoing either a staged or a simultaneous resection. Variables used to calculate the propensity score included patient demographics, patient risk category, extent of liver resection, baseline co-morbidities and hospital characteristics.…”

Hot Spotting as a Strategy to Identify High-Cost Surgical Populations

“…Therefore, a useful strategy for colectomy patients may be to selectively enroll multimorbid patients in prehabilitation programs with the goal of improving perioperative outcomes and potentially improving their tolerance of complications. 23 In contrast, for joint replacement patients in whom spending is largely driven by use of postacute care services, strategies targeted at judicious use of rehabilitation services may be more effective.…”