Hospital Utilization, Treatment Modalities, and Mortality Using Different Biopsy Methods in Infants With Biliary Atresia

Abstract

Objectives To present a nationwide retrospective analysis of the sequelae and aftereffects of different liver biopsy methods in the care of pediatric patients with biliary atresia. Methods The National Inpatient Sample 2001-2013 database was queried for a primary diagnosis of biliary atresia and stratified based on biopsy type including percutaneous, surgical, laparoscopic, and transjugular. Patient demographics, length of stay, hospital costs, type of treatment, and mortality were compared by biopsy type. One-way analysis of variance test and multivariable logistic regression were used for analysis with α < 0.05. Results A total of 4,306 patients with biliary atresia were identified, of whom 2,293 underwent no biopsy, and 723 and 1,080 underwent a percutaneous or surgical biopsy, respectively. Significant differences in socio-demographics were demonstrated between the biopsy types. The length of stay and hospital charges were statistically significantly different between the biopsy types where patients without biopsies had the smallest length compared to percutaneous, surgical, and combination of biopsies. Overall, the Kasai procedure was done more frequently compared to direct liver transplantation, and compared to other biopsy types, undergoing a combination of biopsies had the highest odds of undergoing either procedure. Conclusions When comparing different biopsy methods, surgical biopsies of the liver outperformed percutaneous biopsies in hospital utilization and progression to definitive treatments with the Kasai procedure. Our research indicated that vulnerable populations such as minorities or the indigent may undergo inferior treatments or infrequently undergo definitive treatment. The need for definitive diagnostic guidelines is understated in patients with biliary atresia.