1974
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-64-718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host and Nonhost Effects on Soil Populations of Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sporulation of M. anisopliae s.l. on OA-CTAB 6 is an important factor because early sporulation of target fungi allows their rapid identification (Flowers and Hendrix 1969).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sporulation of M. anisopliae s.l. on OA-CTAB 6 is an important factor because early sporulation of target fungi allows their rapid identification (Flowers and Hendrix 1969).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nicotianae All of the susceptible Hicks and 58-61$ of the moderately resistant Speight G-28 plants died in three separate fields in north Florida which had initial populations of P. parasitica var. nicotianae of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.75 propagule per gram of soil(Mitchell, unpublished ) .Flowers and Hendrix (11,12) also reported severe disease under greenhouse or field conditions where initial populations of F. parasitica var.nicotianae were low. Kannwischer and itchell( unpublished ) found that approximately 0.2 chlamydospore per gram of soil was required for 5°?= infection of tobacco seedlings by P.parasitica var.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%