2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10191-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host diet and evolutionary history explain different aspects of gut microbiome diversity among vertebrate clades

Abstract: Multiple factors modulate microbial community assembly in the vertebrate gut, though studies disagree as to their relative contribution. One cause may be a reliance on captive animals, which can have very different gut microbiomes compared to their wild counterparts. To resolve this disagreement, we analyze a new, large, and highly diverse animal distal gut 16 S rRNA microbiome dataset, which comprises 80% wild animals and includes members of Mammalia, Aves, Reptilia, Amphibia, and Actinopterygii. We decouple … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

40
302
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 399 publications
(343 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
40
302
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we developed an extensive metagenome assembly pipeline and applied it to a multi-species dataset of microbiome diversity across vertebrate species comprising 5 classes: Mammalia, Aves, Reptilia, Amphibia, and Actinopterygii, with >80% of samples obtained from wild individuals 12 combined with data from 14 published animal gut metagenomes. Moreover, we also applied a recently developed gene-based metagenome assembly pipeline to the entire dataset in order to obtain gene-level diversity for rarer taxa that would otherwise be missed by genome-base assembly 13,14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we developed an extensive metagenome assembly pipeline and applied it to a multi-species dataset of microbiome diversity across vertebrate species comprising 5 classes: Mammalia, Aves, Reptilia, Amphibia, and Actinopterygii, with >80% of samples obtained from wild individuals 12 combined with data from 14 published animal gut metagenomes. Moreover, we also applied a recently developed gene-based metagenome assembly pipeline to the entire dataset in order to obtain gene-level diversity for rarer taxa that would otherwise be missed by genome-base assembly 13,14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbial communities differ between hosts that specialize on different substrates (Muegge et al , 2011) and changes in these communities and their functional capacity are integral to their hosts’ transition to utilizing novel substrates (Hammer and Bowers, 2015; Delsuc et al , 2013; Li et al , 2015; Kohl et al , 2014; 2016). This phenomenon is not isolated to herbivores – in many systems, gut microbial communities are influence by the inputs of their hosts (Goffredi et al , 2005; Roman et al , 2015; Muegge et al , 2011; Youngblut et al , 2019; Wang et al , 2011; Li et al , 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, phylosymbiosis is agnostic to mechanism. Additional methods exist for determining the relationship between host phylogeny and the microbiome (e.g., using simulations in Mazel et al, 2018; Mantel tests in Pollock et al, 2018; multiple regression tests in Youngblut et al, 2019); however, the evolutionary processes that generate the microbiome have been relatively unexplored. Here, we proposed utilizing the microbiome as a trait of a host (Benson, 2016;Benson et al, 2010), and extrapolating that trait to host species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%