1961
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/108.3.333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host-Parasite Relationships in Brucellosis: II. Destruction of Macrophage Cultures by Brucella of Different Virulence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
29
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to recent studies suggesting that apoptotic cell death may be blocked by O antigen but continues unabated in cells infected with rough mutants (17), the cell death induced by the rough mutants described here appeared to be necrotic based on early LDH release, annexin V and PI staining, morphological appearance of infected cells, lack of nuclear condensation, and glycine protection. In agreement with the work of Freeman et al (19)(20)(21), the CPE observed was restricted to live bacteria, as it was eliminated by both heat treatment and chloramphenicol pretreatment of the B. abortus (data not shown). Furthermore, these data are in accordance with the work by Freeman and coworkers (19)(20)(21), and more recently by others (24,40,49), describing the ability of rough organisms to replicate within macrophages and/or monocytes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to recent studies suggesting that apoptotic cell death may be blocked by O antigen but continues unabated in cells infected with rough mutants (17), the cell death induced by the rough mutants described here appeared to be necrotic based on early LDH release, annexin V and PI staining, morphological appearance of infected cells, lack of nuclear condensation, and glycine protection. In agreement with the work of Freeman et al (19)(20)(21), the CPE observed was restricted to live bacteria, as it was eliminated by both heat treatment and chloramphenicol pretreatment of the B. abortus (data not shown). Furthermore, these data are in accordance with the work by Freeman and coworkers (19)(20)(21), and more recently by others (24,40,49), describing the ability of rough organisms to replicate within macrophages and/or monocytes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In agreement with the work of Freeman et al (19)(20)(21), the CPE observed was restricted to live bacteria, as it was eliminated by both heat treatment and chloramphenicol pretreatment of the B. abortus (data not shown). Furthermore, these data are in accordance with the work by Freeman and coworkers (19)(20)(21), and more recently by others (24,40,49), describing the ability of rough organisms to replicate within macrophages and/or monocytes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Longer times were not feasible because in these experiments the monocytes infected with brucellas, strain SA-R, underwent degeneration much more rapidly than parallel cultures infected with the same inocula of strain SA-S. These observations remain unexplained, but recall similar findings reported by Freeman, Kross & Circo (1961).…”
Section: Brucella Abortus Strain Sa-rsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The virulence of Brucella relies on its ability to survive and replicate in the vacuolar compartments of macrophages (18). In contrast, many rough derivatives of B. suis, B. abortus, and B. melitensis, which are deficient in the O antigen (or O side chain) associated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), cannot survive inside macrophages and hence are attenuated (11,33).While smooth virulent Brucella strains inhibit programmed macrophage cell death (17, 18), many rough Brucella strains are cytotoxic to macrophages and induce macrophage cell death (7,11,14,30,32). Freeman et al first reported that rough Brucella induced cytopathic cell death (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%