2020
DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1792773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host–pathogen interaction inCandida glabratainfection: current knowledge and implications for antifungal therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model, as such, could be used in the future to test the efficacy of novel antifungal molecules as well as possible novel treatment strategies. Combinatorial antifungal therapies have been proposed, but studies have mainly been carried out in vitro; therefore, their value as antifungal therapy is yet to be established [58]. One other advantage of luminescence imaging is that each animal can be evaluated individually, thereby reducing biological variability, since treatment effectivity can be followed inside the same animal over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model, as such, could be used in the future to test the efficacy of novel antifungal molecules as well as possible novel treatment strategies. Combinatorial antifungal therapies have been proposed, but studies have mainly been carried out in vitro; therefore, their value as antifungal therapy is yet to be established [58]. One other advantage of luminescence imaging is that each animal can be evaluated individually, thereby reducing biological variability, since treatment effectivity can be followed inside the same animal over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, one of the known virulence factors of the C. glabrata complex is its intrinsic low susceptibility to azoles, especially fluconazole [ 7 , 51 , 53 , 67 , 95 , 96 , 97 ]. In general, this is because azoles are the first prophylactic choice against fungal infections due to their low cost, and the second choice for invasive infections produced by different Candida species, generating cross-resistance to the other azoles [ 96 , 98 , 99 , 100 ].…”
Section: Antifungal Resistance Of the C Glabrata Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, the C. glabrata complex has shown drug resistance to the azoles in several cases, which act by inhibiting the 14-α lanosterol demethylase that is encoded by the ERG11 gene. The ERG11 gene is known to participate in ergosterol biosynthesis [ 97 , 117 ]. Interestingly, Hull et al 2012 found that the isolate of C. glabrata (CG156) has an ERG11 mutation that induces a loss of function associated with cross-resistance to azoles and polyenes.…”
Section: Antifungal Resistance Of the C Glabrata Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyenes bind directly to ergosterol in the fungal cell membrane, while azoles target the biosynthesis of this sterol. Echinocandins, on the other hand, target the biosynthesis of glucans in the fungal cell wall [ 19 ]. C. glabrata exhibits intrinsically higher epidemiological cut-off values for azoles compared to other Candida spp and rapidly acquires resistance to azoles [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. glabrata exhibits intrinsically higher epidemiological cut-off values for azoles compared to other Candida spp and rapidly acquires resistance to azoles [ 20 ]. Resistance to echinocandins also occurs but is less frequent, while resistance to polyenes is rare [ 19–21 ]. Interestingly, C. glabrata isolates acquiring rapidly resistance often contain mutations in MSH2 , a gene of the DNA mismatch repair pathway [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%