2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-2194(01)00089-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host plant preference of the stem borer Busseola fusca (Fuller) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…sudanense ) (Khan et al . 2000; Haile & Hofsvang 2002). Haile & Hofsvang (2002) also showed that S. vulgare was the only wild host plant allowing complete development of this insect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…sudanense ) (Khan et al . 2000; Haile & Hofsvang 2002). Haile & Hofsvang (2002) also showed that S. vulgare was the only wild host plant allowing complete development of this insect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2000; Haile & Hofsvang 2002). Haile & Hofsvang (2002) also showed that S. vulgare was the only wild host plant allowing complete development of this insect. The simplest hypothesis is that B. fusca switched from wild to cultivated sorghum during the process of domestication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th is pattern is probably linked to the expansion of its wild host plant (Sorghum arundinaceum (Desv. Stapf ) (Poaceae) (Haile & Hofsvang 2002) during the Pleistocene. Th e presence of individuals of the large population unit, clade KII in Central Africa (Cameroon) is consistent with the hypothesis of a faunistic link between these two regions (Bruhl 1997), which are separated by a distance of 3000 km.…”
Section: Origin and Evolutionary History Of Each Cladementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative hosts in the vicinity of the crop fi elds and crop residues enhance survival of borers during off -season, and thereby are responsible for pest attacks on crops in the subsequent season (Polaszek & Khan 1998). In contrast, oviposition preference studies showed certain wild grasses to be highly attractive to ovipositing moths, though larval survival and adult fecundity are generally low (Haile & Hofsvang 2002). Based on these interactions, hypotheses has been created and validated with fi eld and laboratory trials for S. calamistis and E. Saccharina (Shanower et al 1993;Schulthess et al 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%