1988
DOI: 10.2307/4775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host-Plant Specificity in the Cactophilic Drosophila mulleri Species Complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drosophila mojavensis Patterson and Crow, a member of the mulleri complex of the repleta species group, inhabits the arid desert regions of southwestern USA and northwestern Mexico (Figure 1), feeding and breeding in necrotic tissue (rots) of a variety of cactus species, although within any particular geographic area a specific local host cactus is generally utilized (Heed 1978;Heed and Mangan 1986;Ruiz and Heed 1988;Ruiz et al 1990). A great deal has been learned of the ecology, population genetics and reproductive behaviour of the different geographic populations of D. mojavensis over the last six decades, and the species has become an important model for understanding the timing of early events involved in the process of speciation, including the contributions of geographic and reproductive isolation, and changes in host plant use, that can ultimately lead to genetic divergence among populations (Mettler 1963;Zouros 1973;Zouros and D'Entremont 1980;Etges and Heed 1987;Ruiz et al 1990;Markow 1991;Markow and Hocutt 1998;Hocutt 2000;Knowles and Markow 2001;Ross and Markow 2006;Matzkin et al 2006;Reed et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drosophila mojavensis Patterson and Crow, a member of the mulleri complex of the repleta species group, inhabits the arid desert regions of southwestern USA and northwestern Mexico (Figure 1), feeding and breeding in necrotic tissue (rots) of a variety of cactus species, although within any particular geographic area a specific local host cactus is generally utilized (Heed 1978;Heed and Mangan 1986;Ruiz and Heed 1988;Ruiz et al 1990). A great deal has been learned of the ecology, population genetics and reproductive behaviour of the different geographic populations of D. mojavensis over the last six decades, and the species has become an important model for understanding the timing of early events involved in the process of speciation, including the contributions of geographic and reproductive isolation, and changes in host plant use, that can ultimately lead to genetic divergence among populations (Mettler 1963;Zouros 1973;Zouros and D'Entremont 1980;Etges and Heed 1987;Ruiz et al 1990;Markow 1991;Markow and Hocutt 1998;Hocutt 2000;Knowles and Markow 2001;Ross and Markow 2006;Matzkin et al 2006;Reed et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of mainland Sonora, northern Sinaloa, and Arizona, D. mojavensis uses organ pipe provided other preferred hosts are absent. It uses agria in a very localized patch in coastal Sonora and Stenocereus alamosensis in scattered locations in Sonora and Sinaloa (Ruiz and Heed 1988). Preference for agria over organ pipe rots has been suggested in both field and laboratory choice tests in mainland populations of D. mojavensis (Fellows and Heed 1972;Downing 1985), but no genetic evidence for host preference exists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each host race, mainland Sonora Desert, Baja California, Catalina Island, and Mojave Desert, utilizes a different species of cactus: organpipe (Stenocereus thurberi), agria (S. gummosus), prickly pear (Opuntia spp. ), and barrel (Ferocactus cylindraceus), respectively (Fellows and Heed 1972;Ruiz and Heed 1988). D. mojavensis has been proposed (Ruiz et al 1990) to have originated in Baja California, utilizing a Stenocereus cactus (possibly agria), and then migrated up the peninsula and colonized Catalina Island and the Mojave Desert, shifting cactus hosts in the process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%