2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02656-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host-specific assembly of sponge-associated prokaryotes at high taxonomic ranks

Abstract: Sponges (Porifera) are abundant and diverse members of benthic filter feeding communities in most marine ecosystems, from the deep sea to tropical reefs. A characteristic feature is the associated dense and diverse prokaryotic community present within the sponge mesohyl. Previous molecular genetic studies revealed the importance of host identity for the community composition of the sponge-associated microbiota. However, little is known whether sponge host-specific prokaryotic community patterns observed at 97%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Data shown here indicate that P. magna is most likely a LMA sponge, as it presents a microbiota dominated by one phylum, represented by few and abundant OTUs. When a large number of sponges from the class Demospongiae were analyzed, researchers were not able to find a prokaryotic signature of the class, as the reported microbiota compositions were usually species-specific [51]. In order to investigate this pattern in the class Calcarea, we analyzed the available microbiota found for other species available in the SRA database.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data shown here indicate that P. magna is most likely a LMA sponge, as it presents a microbiota dominated by one phylum, represented by few and abundant OTUs. When a large number of sponges from the class Demospongiae were analyzed, researchers were not able to find a prokaryotic signature of the class, as the reported microbiota compositions were usually species-specific [51]. In order to investigate this pattern in the class Calcarea, we analyzed the available microbiota found for other species available in the SRA database.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These prokaryotic communities show sponge species-specific patterns that differ in richness, diversity, and structure from the prokaryotic seawater communities. The composition of the sponge symbiont consortia is shaped by host taxonomy in that sponge species have species-specific prokaryotic communities (Pita et al, 2013;Easson and Thacker, 2014;Thomas et al, 2016;Steinert et al, 2017;Cárdenas et al, 2019). Machine learning provided evidence that the dichotomy between high microbial (HMA) and low microbial abundance (LMA) sponges is a main driver of the sponge-associated community patterns (Moitinho-Silva et al, 2017c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most sponge microbiome studies have focused on demosponges that were collected from shallow coastal sites in temperate, subtropical, and tropical sampling locations (e.g., Schmitt et al, 2012;Moitinho-Silva et al, 2014;Naim et al, 2014;Thomas et al, 2016;Steinert et al, 2017;Helber et al, 2019). Considering that the deep-sea is the largest, still relatively underexplored habitat on earth, comparably few studies have been conducted on sponges from remote deep-sea or cold-water locations (e.g., Jackson et al, 2013;Kennedy et al, 2014;Reveillaud et al, 2014;Borchert et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite methodological differences, the results from different approaches characterizing 16S rRNA gene profiles are highly reproducible, yielding detection differences only in low-abundance phyla such as Fusobacteria, Parcubacteria, PAUC34f, Hydrogenedentes and Saccharibacteria (Figure 2), some of which are part of the recently described candidate phyla radiation (Brown et al, 2015). These results are in accordance with other 16S rRNA gene based investigations, indicating that these methods are well established for molecular profiling of sponge microbiomes (Thomas et al, 2016;Chaib De Mares et al, 2017;Steinert et al, 2017;Dat et al, 2018). The vast majority of the abundant microbial taxa are detectable with both methods (overlap).…”
supporting
confidence: 84%