2001
DOI: 10.1006/bcon.2000.0909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host Stage Selection and Suitability in Cephalonomia stephanoderis Betrem (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae), a Parasitoid of the Coffee Berry Borer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S. harmandi is a synovigenic anautogenous species (i.e., oogenesis takes place after females feed on hosts and are stimulated by direct access to suitable hosts for oviposition) [9]. The pre-oviposition period usually lasts several days according to host species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. harmandi is a synovigenic anautogenous species (i.e., oogenesis takes place after females feed on hosts and are stimulated by direct access to suitable hosts for oviposition) [9]. The pre-oviposition period usually lasts several days according to host species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. harmandi is a synovigenic anautogenous species in which oogenesis takes place after females feed on hosts and is stimulated by direct access to suitable hosts for oviposition [8], [15]. Because host meals are essential for oogenesis throughout the reproductive lifetime, parasitoids are often considered to have inherent parental conflicts of interest vis-à-vis their progeny [16]–[17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang and Wan (2011) report that E. hayati females prefer younger to older hosts for both feeding and oviposition. These findings contradict the general predictions for feeding and oviposition strategies, which suggest that when hosts of different stages are present, a parasitoid should select lower quality hosts for feeding and higher quality hosts for oviposition (Kidd and Jervis, 1991;Chan and Godfray, 1993;Heimpel and Rosenheim, 1995;Lauzière et al, 2001). However, among the preferred mid-aged hosts, E. warrae parasitized six to seven times more nymphs than fed when all instars were present (Table 1) and parasitized about five times more nymphs than fed in the single-instar experiment (Fig.…”
Section: Host Instarsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Due to the destructive nature of feeding, Eretmocerus females must have developed strategies to partition the use of hosts for feeding and oviposition. General models predict that a foraging parasitoid should select lower quality hosts for feeding and higher quality ones for oviposition (Kidd and Jervis, 1991;Chan and Godfray, 1993;Heimpel and Rosenheim, 1995;Lauzière et al, 2001). However, female parasitoids prefer hosts of similar stages for both feeding and oviposition in E. melanoscutus Zolnerowich and Rose (Zang and Liu, 2008) and E. hayati Zolnerowich and Rose (Yang and Wan, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%