“…The notion of "hostile architecture" or "hostile design" has become important within contemporary research and criticism on the politics of urban spaces, especially in online journalism, blogging, and social media. An academic discussion is also beginning to emerge, one that is widely interdisciplinary and still largely fragmented and exploratory (e.g., Savicic & Savic, 2013;Rosenberger, 2014;Schindler, 2015;Chellew, 2016;Petty, 2016;Armborst et al, 2017;de Fine Licht, 2017;Jensen, 2017;Rosenberger, 2017a;Stevens, 2017;Smith & Walters, 2018;Chellew, 2019;de Fine Licht, 2020;Eggersglüß, 2020;Crippen & Klement, 2020;Jensen, 2020;Lorini & Moroni, 2020;Rosenberger, 2020b;Binnington & Russo, 2021;Lynch, 2021;Nitrato Izzo, 2022;Giamariano et al, 2023;Kullman, 2023;Moatasim, 2023). The fledgling status of this discussion is reflected in the variety of terms used in different writings to refer to similar phenomena, which, in addition to "hostile architecture" and "hostile design, " include "unpleasant design, " "disciplinary architecture, " "architectural exclusion, " "defensive architecture, " and others.…”