Innovative Research Methodologies in Management 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64394-6_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hosting a Successful Metamodern Party: Mixed Methods Management Research on the Web 2.0+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, 640 valid and fully usable questionnaires were collected. The response rate was 34.5%, well above the typical 10-25% response rates for online surveys (Zarkada et al 2018). IBM ® SPSS ® 27 was used for data analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Overall, 640 valid and fully usable questionnaires were collected. The response rate was 34.5%, well above the typical 10-25% response rates for online surveys (Zarkada et al 2018). IBM ® SPSS ® 27 was used for data analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…To recruit focus group (FG) participants we conducted an online survey with a quasi-monetary incentive, a season ticket for their favourite team, for FG participation. The survey was promoted via banner advertising, social media and content marketing on the most popular independent sports site in the country (Zarkada et al, 2018). This approach, which has been found to be effective in previous football studies (Bauer et al, 2005), produced satisfying results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We intend that, in sports and marketing contexts, it is considered crucial to combine the methodological approaches to progress in scientific research. For instance a study of the consumer-based brand equity of celebrity footballers is presented as an example of an exploratory sequential mixed methods design combining on line sampling, focus group participant recruitment, and quantitative data collection with traditional focus groups (Zarkada et al, 2018).…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%