2009
DOI: 10.2514/1.44468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hot- and Cold-Case Orbits for Robust Thermal Control

Abstract: Realizing cheaper, more flexible alternatives to traditional satellites requires robust design approaches. Robust satellite subsystems are designed to meet a broad range of mission requirements; consequently, they drastically reduce nonrecurring engineering costs and greatly diminish design, development, assembly, integration, and test schedules. Robust thermal control subsystems must be capable of handling a broad range of thermal environments, thus reducing design and development costs but can be susceptible… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This analysis derives temperatures in the 150 to 210 K range, for a satellite in a Sun-synchronous orbit. Furthermore, an analysis for different solar beta angles (the beta angle is the angle between the orbital plane of the satellite and the geocentric position of the Sun) to select the worst-case thermal environment was developed by Hengeveld et al 49 The guidelines and methodologies developed by NASA to obtain the worst-case thermal scenario in LEO can be found in the literature. 50,51 The approach followed by Yenchesky et al 52 for the thermal analysis of an FSOC CubeSat is characterizing statistically the environmental thermal parameters and computing a Monte Carlo simulation.…”
Section: Thermal Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis derives temperatures in the 150 to 210 K range, for a satellite in a Sun-synchronous orbit. Furthermore, an analysis for different solar beta angles (the beta angle is the angle between the orbital plane of the satellite and the geocentric position of the Sun) to select the worst-case thermal environment was developed by Hengeveld et al 49 The guidelines and methodologies developed by NASA to obtain the worst-case thermal scenario in LEO can be found in the literature. 50,51 The approach followed by Yenchesky et al 52 for the thermal analysis of an FSOC CubeSat is characterizing statistically the environmental thermal parameters and computing a Monte Carlo simulation.…”
Section: Thermal Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Under this approach, orbital-averaged environmental conditions as a function of temporal variations of beta angle (i.e. the minimum angle between the orbit place and solar vector), orbit inclination, orbit altitude, and historical launch data were evaluated.…”
Section: Traditionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hot and cold cases of low Earth orbits (LEOs) [12], as well as a geostationary orbit (GEO), were used for bounding the thermal environments of the electronic components inside the Cube-Sat. Table 1 lists the main characteristics of the orbits, while Figure 2 shows the hot and cold LEO cases corresponding to orbital angles of β = 72 • and 0 • , respectively.…”
Section: Cubesat Thermal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%