2010
DOI: 10.1179/136217109x12590746472454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hot cracking behaviour and susceptibility of extra high purity type 310 stainless steels

Abstract: Recent progress in the refining technology has enabled the production of highly pure commercial stainless steels. The hot cracking behaviour of these stainless steels was investigated with respect to type 310 stainless steel. For comparison, four types of 310 stainless steels with various amounts of minor and impurity elements such as C, P and S were used. The purity of type 310 stainless steels used was enhanced in the order of type 310,type 310S,type 310ULC,type 310EHP steels. The hot cracking susceptibility… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is desirable to avoid hot cracking on the material surface when measuring the strain via in-situ observation during the Trans-Varestraint test. According to a previous study [7][8][9]13] on hot cracking, solidification cracking occurs between the solidification starting temperature and solidification completion temperature. In other words, solidification cracking is less likely to occur in the case of a small solidliquid coexistence temperature range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it is desirable to avoid hot cracking on the material surface when measuring the strain via in-situ observation during the Trans-Varestraint test. According to a previous study [7][8][9]13] on hot cracking, solidification cracking occurs between the solidification starting temperature and solidification completion temperature. In other words, solidification cracking is less likely to occur in the case of a small solidliquid coexistence temperature range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if such a method is adopted, the determination of the melting boundary when the yoke is dropped becomes unclear, and the measured crack length is inaccurate after the test [21]. Therefore, in this study, the method of dropping the yoke just after the extinction of the arc was adopted, as described by some researchers [7][8][9]13].…”
Section: Trans-varestraint Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼の凝固割れは,初晶 γ 凝固 の場合に問題になる.γ 相は δ 相に比べて S および P の固溶 度が小さいため,凝固時のミクロ偏析が増大する.従って, 不純物元素を低減する,適量の δ 相を含有する成分にする 1,2) などの対策が取られている. 凝固過程の固液共存域では延性が極めて低いことが知ら れており [5][6][7] .Fig. 1 にいくつかの凝固プロセスにおける凝固 速度と温度勾配の関係を示す 8) .溶接プロセスは連続鋳造に 比べて温度勾配が大きいことが特徴である.1 次デンドライ トアーム間隔 λ 1 は Kurz-Fisher により,(1) 式で表わされる 9) . λ 1 = 4.3 (ΔT 0 DΓ⁄k) 1 ⁄ 4 V -1 ⁄ 4 G - 1 ⁄ 2 (1)…”
Section: 緒 言unclassified
“…An advanced type 316FR austenitic stainless steel which has improved creep rupture properties compared with other austenitic stainless steels is hopefully applied to the next generation of commercial fast breeder reactor (FBR, using fast neutrons that breed Pu-239 from U-238) in Japan [1]. Especially, the weld metal of type 316FR stainless steel is intentionally rendered inhomogeneity by introducing some amount of δ-ferrite in order to avoid hot cracking [2]. This issue would promote the transformation of intermetallic phases such as sigma (σ) and chi (χ) under the high temperature range from 873 K to 1173 K, which could also affect various mechanical and chemical properties [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%