2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40195-019-00913-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hot Deformation Behavior of an Ultra-High-Strength Fe–Ni–Co-Based Maraging Steel

Abstract: Hot processing behavior of an ultra-high-strength Fe-Ni-Co-based maraging steel was studied in temperature range of 900-1200 °C and strain rate range of 0.001-10 s −1 . Deformation processing parameters and optimum hot working window were characterized via flow stress analysis, constitutive equation construction, hot processing map calculation and microstructure evolution, respectively. Critical strain value for dynamic recrystallization was determined through theoretical mathematical differential method: the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is apparent that the calculated here activation energy value for AM 18Ni300 steel is similar to that of conventionally manufactured M300 grade (391 kJ/mol) [ 19 ], M350 grade (371 kJ/mol) [ 20 ] and is much lower than that of CF250 grade (458.8 kJ/mol) [ 27 ] in magnitude. Further, the activation energy value for AM 18Ni300 value is much larger than the values for self-diffusion in γ-iron ( Q = 280 kJ mol −1 ), implying that dynamic recovery and dynamic recrystallization are the dominant mechanisms instead of diffusion during hot deformation [ 28 ]. It is also worth noting that the calculated Q value for the maraging steel AM 18Ni-300 is similar to that of the conventionally produced grade M300 ( Q = 390 kJ mol −1 ) [ 19 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is apparent that the calculated here activation energy value for AM 18Ni300 steel is similar to that of conventionally manufactured M300 grade (391 kJ/mol) [ 19 ], M350 grade (371 kJ/mol) [ 20 ] and is much lower than that of CF250 grade (458.8 kJ/mol) [ 27 ] in magnitude. Further, the activation energy value for AM 18Ni300 value is much larger than the values for self-diffusion in γ-iron ( Q = 280 kJ mol −1 ), implying that dynamic recovery and dynamic recrystallization are the dominant mechanisms instead of diffusion during hot deformation [ 28 ]. It is also worth noting that the calculated Q value for the maraging steel AM 18Ni-300 is similar to that of the conventionally produced grade M300 ( Q = 390 kJ mol −1 ) [ 19 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dislocation density progressively increased during deformation, leading to the creation of a substructure and resulting in material softening. [20] The dynamic recovery (DRV) was caused with substructure and deformation increasing, [21,22] and the relationship between substructure and strain rate [23][24][25] is expressed as Equation ( 1)…”
Section: Macromorphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, low melting point materials such as aluminium start sticking at the nozzle's throat after an inevitable rise in the process gas temperature, leading to nozzle clogging and an undesirable decrease in deposition efficiency. Therefore, the upper limit of the temperature for attaining maximum particle velocity without nozzle clogging depends on the feedstock properties [81][82][83][84]. The optimum gas temperature for each material category to avoid nozzle clogging is a subject for further investigations.…”
Section: 11 X For Peer Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in pressure of the process gas increases the acceleration rate of the particles in the nozzle, enabling the particles to attain significantly high velocities before leaving the nozzle [81]. Therefore, an increase in pressure of the process gas yields high energy impact of particles at the substrate, which enhances mechanical interlocking and promotes metallurgical bonding at the particle-substrate and particle-particle interfaces [82]. Furthermore, higher energy impact results in deeper penetration of the particles into the substrate and the consecutive layers.…”
Section: Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%