2021
DOI: 10.1002/srin.202000643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hot Ductility and Fracture Behavior of High‐Ti Weathering Steel

Abstract: The hot ductility behavior of high‐Ti weathering steel is studied by high‐temperature tensile testing in the temperature range of 650–1100 ºC. The results reveal a ductility trough in high‐Ti steel in the range of 650–962, 650–925, and 700–880 °C with minimum reduction in area (RA) of 22.21%, 36.53%, and 43.25% at 800 ºC and different strain rates of 1.0 × 10−3, 5.0 × 10−3, and 1.0 × 10−2 s−1, respectively. A number of secondary cracks containing S, N, and Ti propagate along the grain boundary, and the obvious… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Arrhenius model [10] and the Johnson-Cook (J-C) model [11] are two widely used phenomenological models, which have been successfully used to predict the flow behavior of a variety of materials. [12][13][14] However, these models are of little metallurgical significance and cannot reflect the evolution of microstructure. Therefore, different types of physical constitutive models have been proposed, including Zerilli-Armstrong (Z-A) model, [15] model based on dynamic recovery (DRV) and DRX mechanisms, [16,17] model based on dislocation mechanism, [18] and so on; these physical models are proposed with consideration of micromechanisms but have a large number of material constants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Arrhenius model [10] and the Johnson-Cook (J-C) model [11] are two widely used phenomenological models, which have been successfully used to predict the flow behavior of a variety of materials. [12][13][14] However, these models are of little metallurgical significance and cannot reflect the evolution of microstructure. Therefore, different types of physical constitutive models have been proposed, including Zerilli-Armstrong (Z-A) model, [15] model based on dynamic recovery (DRV) and DRX mechanisms, [16,17] model based on dislocation mechanism, [18] and so on; these physical models are proposed with consideration of micromechanisms but have a large number of material constants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%