2011
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20111103005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hot Jupiter secondary eclipses measured byKepler

Abstract: Abstract. Hot-Jupiters are known to be dark in visible bandpasses, mainly because of the alkali metal absorption features. The outstanding quality of the Kepler mission photometry allows a detection (or non-detection upper limits on) giant planet secondary eclipses at visible wavelengths. We present such measurements on published planets from Kepler Q1 data. We then explore how to disentangle between the planetary thermal emission and the reflected light components that can both contribute to the detected sign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the detection of companions orbiting around a parent star requires high resolution on one hand, because of the small separation between them, and high dynamic range on the other hand, because of the substantial flux ratio. More precisely, the contrast between the companion and the star can easily reach values from 10 −3 −10 −5 (for hot Jupiters in the visible, see Demory & Seager 2011) down to 10 −8 or less depending on the wavelength range and the size and distance of the planet. This kind of target is particularly challenging for ground-based telescopes that are subject to atmospheric effects, the main cause of image degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the detection of companions orbiting around a parent star requires high resolution on one hand, because of the small separation between them, and high dynamic range on the other hand, because of the substantial flux ratio. More precisely, the contrast between the companion and the star can easily reach values from 10 −3 −10 −5 (for hot Jupiters in the visible, see Demory & Seager 2011) down to 10 −8 or less depending on the wavelength range and the size and distance of the planet. This kind of target is particularly challenging for ground-based telescopes that are subject to atmospheric effects, the main cause of image degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%