Hotels’ experience of green environment management and innovation performance: stewardship of multiple green drivers

Sharif, Shahbaz; Yousaf, Hummaira Qudsia; Shaikh, Sadia; Mirza, Farhan; Gantulga, Urandelger

doi:10.1080/09640568.2022.2070462

Cited by 9 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 72 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, there was good predictive accuracy and adequacy. Sharif et al, 2022). The results show that ODJ was found to have a significant mediating relationship between NAR and CWB (b = 0.021, t-values = 1.989, p-value = 0.032), so H8a was supported because NAR indirectly and significantly impacted CWB.…”

Section: Discriminant Validitymentioning

confidence: 77%

“…The researchers suggest a criterion for the acceptance of factor loadings that should be higher than the value of 0.70 and AVE, which should be higher than 0.50. This means the items of latent construct explain over 50% of the total variance (Sharif et al , 2022). For this purpose, the PLS algorithm was run, and the study found that two items of CWB had lower factor loadings (CWB1 = 0.651, CWB7 = 0.592); and one item of OIJ had lower and negative factor loadings (OIJ7 = 0.569); so, the study removed these items from the model.…”

Section: Findings Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Reliability is assessed to measure the international consistency among the construct items (Hair et al , 2020). The results showed that the composite reliability value for each construct is higher than the threshold value of 0.70 (Sharif et al , 2022; Sarstedt et al , 2019), which indicates that the composite reliability is used to measure the overall construct reliability and the value of it should be higher than the value of 0.70 (Richter et al , 2020; Sharif et al , 2022). Therefore, the reliability of the constructs was confirmed (Table 1).…”

Section: Findings Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Second, the Fornell–Larcker criteria (1981) assess the discriminant validity. This criterion also suggests that the value of a particular construct should be higher with itself and the other constructs in the diagonal style (Fornell and Larcker, 1981; Sharif et al , 2022). It is the square root of the AVE, and the value indicates that there is good construct validity.…”

Section: Findings Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…R and adjusted R are used to measure the effect strength of an exogenous construct on an endogenous construct. Their values vary from 0.25 to 0.75 as the value of 0.25, or higher value indicates a weak effect, 0.50 or higher value indicates a moderate effect and 0.75 or higher value indicates a strong effect of an exogenous construct on an endogenous construct (Hair et al , 2020; Sarstedt et al , 2019; Sharif et al , 2022). Table 5 shows that a set of predictors (PSY, NAR and MAC) has a moderate effect on CWB (0.667), which is about 66.7% variations in CWB; however, the predictors have weak effects on ODJ (0.375), OIJ (0.402) and OPJ (0.345) which are about 37.5%, 40.2% and 34.5% of the total variance, respectively.…”

Section: Findings Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A dark side of land revenue management and counterproductive work behavior: does organizational injustice add fuel to fire?

Sharif

Lodhi

Jain

et al. 2022

JOPP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study empirically and theoretically aims to explore the consequences of top management’s dark personality traits (DPT) on organizational injustice, e.g. organizational procedural justice (OPJ), organizational interactional justice (OIJ) and organizational distributive justice (ODJ) and counterproductive work behavior (CWB). Design/methodology/approach A study was conducted to examine the influence of DPT on CWB among the contractual employees of the land revenue department, Pakistan. The quantitative method was employed using a convenient sampling approach. A designed survey questionnaire was distributed among 1,240 land revenue officials in 13 districts of Pakistan. Findings The results supported that dark DPT directly, significantly and positively affects CWB. In addition, DPT, except for psychopathy (PSY), significantly and negatively affects OPJ, OIJ and ODJ. Meanwhile, OIJ and OPJ strengthen the negative relationship between CWB and Machiavellianism and narcissism (NAR); however, PSY failed directly to affect OPJ, OIP and ODJ indirectly failed to capture CWB. Practical implications Top management/government should pay attention to fair dealings among the contractual employees. Consequently, they would prefer to do well in the workplace. Particularly, top management should avoid practicing DPT, which has ultimate results in CWB. Social implications Public managers should avoid DPT because they are not compatible with public needs. Managers with DPT negatively affect their employees' productivity behaviors. Therefore, managers should focus on positive personality traits to enhance employees' productivity via organizational justice. Originality/value This study is unique in the land revenue department of Pakistan, where unfair dealings are being practiced among contractual employees. Surprisingly, CWB is the ultimate consequence of both DPT and top management's dishonest dealings (e.g. organizational injustices).

show abstract

Section: Discriminant Validitymentioning

confidence: 77%

Section: Findings Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%